The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Iowa Senate File 2177 requires libraries and digital service providers to block explicit content for minors
Last action · February 12, 2026: Subcommittee recommends amendment and passage.Sponsor: Sandy Salmon
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Senate File 2177 prohibits state, city, school, and district s from offering s to minors unless they adopt protection measures blocking child pornography, hard-core pornography, obscene material, controlled substance materials, and visual depictions of minors. Third-party vendors contracting with libraries must implement identical safeguards, and libraries must report noncompliant vendors to the attorney general within 30 days.
s and third-party digital vendors face contract penalties, mandatory attorney general reporting, and required content-blocking technology for all users under 18 or enrolled in primary or secondary schools.
- Senate File 2177 was introduced in the Iowa Senate during the 91st General Assembly by Senator Salmon. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Library providers
Library providers must adopt protective blocking policies, modify third-party contracts, and report vendor noncompliance to the attorney general within 30 days.
Third-party contractors
Contractors offering digital library services must install content-blocking measures, face financial penalties or contract termination for noncompliance, and are subject to attorney general investigation.
Minors
Minors under 18 or enrolled in school are restricted from accessing specific categories of explicit content and controlled substance materials through digital library services.
Key Facts
- Library providers include the state, state agencies, city-established libraries, library districts, public schools, and nonpublic schools.
- Digital library services include book checkouts, online database searches, online portals, and remote learning and research tools.
- Library providers must adopt policies and measures that block minors from sending, receiving, viewing, or downloading child pornography, hard-core pornography, obscene material, controlled substance materials, and visual depictions of a minor.
- Third-party contractors offering digital library services must adopt the same policies and measures as library providers.
Show all 14 facts
- Contracts with third parties must include a clause allowing library providers to withhold payments without penalty for noncompliance.
- A third party's failure to comply for 30 consecutive calendar days constitutes a breach of contract.
- Repeat noncompliance requires third parties to reduce contract amounts by 10 percent, waive further payments, or issue full refunds depending on the frequency of violations.
- Before withholding payment or declaring a breach, library providers must give written notice specifying the violation and provide 30 calendar days for the third party to cure the noncompliance or present evidence of compliance.
- Third parties retain the opportunity to seek a judicial determination of their contractual rights in a court of competent jurisdiction after 30 days of notice.
- Library providers must report a third party's failure to comply to the attorney general within 30 consecutive calendar days of learning of the noncompliance.
- Reports made to the attorney general regarding noncompliant third parties are designated as public records.
- The attorney general is required to investigate and enforce compliance with the new chapter.
- The chapter does not apply to service providers unless they are directly providing a digital library service.
- The chapter exempts digital library services used by students enrolled in institutions of higher education governed by the state board of regents or a community college, including dual-enrolled students.
Frequently Asked Questions
What organizations are classified as library providers under this bill?
Are higher education students affected by these digital content restrictions?
What happens if a third-party digital library vendor fails to comply with the blocking rules?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
5 actions- Feb 12, 2026Iowa LegislatureSubcommittee recommends amendment and passage.
- Feb 10, 2026SenateSubcommittee Meeting: 02/12/2026 12:00PM Senate Lounge.
- Feb 10, 2026Iowa LegislatureSubcommittee reassigned: Alons, Bennett, and Sires.
- Feb 4, 2026SenateSubcommittee: Sires, Bennett, and Kraayenbrink. S.J. 200 .
- Feb 3, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced, referred to Technology. S.J. 186 .
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Mandatory Vendor Contract Penalties
The bill establishes rigid statutory escalation tiers for vendor noncompliance, moving from 30-day cure periods to mandatory payment withholding, 10 percent contract reductions, and full refunds.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.iowa.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz65Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools