The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on U.S. Strategy in Syria Post-ISIS
Record date · January 1, 2020
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a hearing on January 11, 2018, to examine U.S. policy in Syria following the territorial defeat of ISIS. Senators questioned the administration's long-term military presence, diplomatic strategy, and efforts to counter the influence of Iran and Russia in the region.
This hearing addresses the legal and strategic basis for the continued deployment of approximately 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria and the government's approach to regional stability and humanitarian concerns.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Military Personnel
Troops are subject to ongoing deployment and mission changes in Syria based on administration policy.
Syrian Civilians
The population faces ongoing displacement and violence from the civil war and military operations in de-escalation zones.
Israel
The security environment is impacted by the presence of Iranian proxies in southern Syria.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on January 11, 2018, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The Syrian conflict has resulted in over 400,000 deaths and the displacement of 12 million people.
- The Syrian Democratic Forces, supported by the U.S. and coalition partners, removed ISIS from Raqqa in October 2017.
- The U.S., Russia, and Jordan signed a memorandum of principles on November 8, 2017, regarding administrative arrangements in southwest Syria.
Show all 9 facts
- The Assad regime has conducted military attacks in Idlib and Eastern Ghouta, designated as 'de-escalation zones'.
- Approximately 2,000 U.S. troops are currently deployed in Syria.
- The Department of Defense did not send a witness to this hearing.
- Senators raised concerns regarding the legal authorization (AUMF) for U.S. military presence in Syria post-ISIS.
- The committee discussed the potential for an Iranian 'land bridge' between Tehran and Beirut and its impact on Israeli security.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are U.S. troops still in Syria?
What is the 'land bridge' concern mentioned in the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Transition to Conditions-Based Presence
The administration shifted to a 'conditions-based' military presence in Syria without providing Congress with specific exit criteria.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools