POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Army and Air Force Modernization (FY 2018)

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing sets the legislative foundation for the Fiscal Year 2018 defense budget, which determines funding levels for military equipment, personnel, and technology development programs that impact national security and defense industry contracts.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Army

The branch is subject to modernization requirements and budget authorizations determined by the committee.

U.S. Air Force

The branch is subject to modernization requirements and budget authorizations determined by the committee.

Defense Contractors

Companies involved in the development of military systems like DCGS-A or active protection systems are impacted by congressional oversight and funding decisions.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document contains the transcript of Senate Armed Services Subcommittee hearings held in March 2017 regarding the modernization of U.S. Army and Air Force capabilities. The hearings focused on addressing capability gaps against global rivals and evaluating the status of major defense programs.

Key Facts

  • The subcommittee held hearings on March 22 and March 29, 2017, to review Army and Air Force modernization efforts.
  • The hearings were conducted in support of S. 1519, the Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2018.
  • Senator Cotton stated that the Army is currently facing capability gaps in long-range artillery, integrated air defense, and cyber warfare compared to Russia and China.
  • The subcommittee investigated the deployment status of active protection systems for Abrams, Bradley, and Stryker combat vehicles.
  • The Distributed Common Ground System-Army (DCGS-A) was identified as a program that has received billions in funding over a decade but faces criticism regarding its battlefield utility.
  • The hearing included testimony from senior military officials regarding the future of combat vehicle design and emerging technologies.
  • The document includes a record of questions for the record submitted to the Department of Defense.

Why It Matters

The hearing sets the legislative foundation for the Fiscal Year 2018 defense budget, which determines funding levels for military equipment, personnel, and technology development programs that impact national security and defense industry contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of these hearings?
The hearings were held to evaluate how the U.S. military is modernizing its equipment and strategies to prepare for future conflicts and to inform the Fiscal Year 2018 defense budget.
What specific military programs were discussed?
The hearing specifically mentioned for combat vehicles and the Distributed Common Ground System-Army ().

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift from Counter-Insurgency to Great Power Competition

The hearing marks a clear pivot in 2017 toward preparing for conflict with 'great powers' like Russia and China, moving away from the focus on short-term readiness for counter-insurgency operations.

Connected Entities

personTom CottonChairman of the Subcommittee on AirlandMap →
personRobert W. Dyess Jr.Major General, Acting Director, Army Capabilities Integration CenterMap →
personJohn M. MurrayLieutenant General, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8, U.S. ArmyMap →
personJoseph AndersonLieutenant General, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. ArmyMap →
personJerry D. Harris Jr.Lieutenant General, Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Plans, Programs and RequMap →
personRobert L. MarionBrigadier General, Deputy of Acquisition and Systems ManagementMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record