POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofHealth →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Removes Time Limits for Filing Progressive Massive Fibrosis Workers' Compensation Claims

Original title: Removing time limits for filing or modifying claims for massive fibrosis

Last action · February 10, 2026: To JudiciarySponsors: Tom Takubo and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 895 removes statutory time limits for filing initial workers' compensation claims or requests to reopen existing claims involving , and establishes a 15 percent rating for the condition.

Why it matters

Workers diagnosed with gain the right to file for compensation or modify prior claims at any time without facing standard expiration deadlines, and receive a guaranteed minimum rating of 15 percent.

Background
  • Workers' compensation claims in West Virginia are generally subject to strict statutory time limits and closing periods under the state code. context
  • Progressive massive fibrosis is an advanced complication of coal worker's pneumoconiosis resulting from long-term exposure to coal mine dust and silica. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Workers with progressive massive fibrosis

Workers diagnosed with progressive massive fibrosis are permitted to file initial claims or reopen existing claims without time restrictions and receive a specific 15 percent disability rating.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill set a deadline for filing a claim if I have progressive massive fibrosis?
No. The legislation explicitly removes time limitations for filing an initial claim or requesting the reopening of an claim when evidence shows the presence of pulmonary massive fibrosis.
What disability rating is assigned for progressive massive fibrosis under the bill?
A diagnosis of is considered a 15 percent disability.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  2. Feb 10, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  3. Feb 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 10, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Removal of Statute of Limitations for Severe Pneumoconiosis

The legislation creates an explicit carve-out from standard multi-year reopening caps for workers suffering from progressive massive fibrosis.

Connected Entities

Robbie Morris, Vince Deeds, Bill Hamilton and 8 more
PersonRobbie Morris“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonVince Deeds“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonBill Hamilton“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonRandy Smith“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonRyan Weld“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonTom Takubo“Lead sponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonGlenn Jeffries“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonJack Woodrum“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonMike Woelfel“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonZack Maynard“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonTrenton Barnhart“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record