POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts Bill H.2154 Establishes Mandatory Parking Cash-Out Programs for Employers

Original title: An Act establishing parking cash-out

Last action · October 29, 2025: Accompanied a new draft, see H4658Sponsors: Steve Owens and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Employers in Massachusetts with at least 10 employees that offer parking benefits must provide a daily or monthly cash-out option equivalent to the market rate of parking for employees who choose not to drive alone to work. Covered businesses must submit biennial reports to the department of transportation, and the department of revenue is authorized to levy fines for noncompliance.

Why it matters

Qualifying employees gain the option to receive equivalent financial value through transit subsidies or taxable cash if they decline employer-provided parking, while affected employers face new record-keeping, reporting, and cash-out administration requirements.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employers with at least 10 employees

Employers offering parking benefits must establish daily or monthly cash-out programs, maintain records for four years, file reports with the Department of Transportation, and face potential fines for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Employees offered parking benefits

Employees may decline employer-provided parking and receive an equivalent financial benefit in the form of transit subsidies, taxable cash, or a combination of both.

Directly affected

Department of Revenue

The department is required to annually adjust market rate costs of parking, submit biennial reports to legislative committees, impose fines for violations, and appoint at least two employees to oversee implementation.

Directly affected

Department of Transportation

The department must create an awareness and compliance assistance program, make information available in multiple languages on its website, and collect reports from covered employers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which employers are required to offer a parking cash-out program?
The requirements apply to every employer that offers a parking benefit to its workers and employs at least 10 employees, with exceptions for the federal government, certain pre-existing leases, specific vehicle-reimbursed employees, and certain collective bargaining agreements.
What choices are provided to employees under a parking cash-out program?
Employees who decline the offered parking benefit can choose tax-exempt employer-paid transit or vanpool subsidies, taxable cash, or a combination of both equal to or greater than the market value of the parking space.
What penalties do employers face for violating the act?
The Department of Revenue shall impose fines or penalties of no less than the amount employees would have been entitled to receive as and no more than 5 times that amount.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Oct 29, 2025House
    Accompanied a new draft, see H4658
  2. Jul 10, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 07/22/2025 from 10:00 AM-01:00 PM in B-2
  3. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  4. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Labor and Workforce Development

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Companion Draft Action

According to legislative progress tracking, this bill was accompanied by a new draft, H4658, indicating ongoing legislative refinement.

Connected Entities

Internal Revenue Service, Department of Revenue, Vanna Howard and 8 more
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service“Federal agency with regulations regarding vehicle use reimbursement”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Revenue“State department tasked with adjusting market rates, submitting reports, and imp”Map →
PersonVanna Howard“Cosponsor of House Bill No. 2154”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Transportation“State department receiving employer reports and running awareness programs”Map →
PersonSteve Owens“Representative who filed House Bill No. 2154”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Transportation“Legislative committee receiving periodic reports from the department of revenue”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Court“Legislative body providing public service information”Map →
PersonJim Hawkins“Cosponsor of House Bill No. 2154”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Ways and Means“Legislative committee receiving periodic reports from the department of revenue”Map →
OrganizationHouse Committee on Ways and Means“Legislative committee receiving periodic reports from the department of revenue”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Revenue“Legislative committee receiving periodic reports from the department of revenue”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record