POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Iowa Senate File 2157 Establishes Civil Claim Standards for Malicious Prosecution Between Private Parties

Original title: A bill for an act relating to malicious prosecution arising from civil actions between private parties.

Last action · March 4, 2026: Subcommittee recommends passage.Sponsor: Adrian Dickey

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Iowa Senate File 2157 allows individuals to file a civil action for against private parties who initiated prior civil claims without and with , without requiring proof of special injury such as arrest or property seizure.

Why it matters

Private litigants defending against unmerited civil actions can seek damages without meeting heightened historical injury thresholds, provided they prove the prior case ended in their favor and lacked legal justification.

Background
  • Senate File 2157 was introduced in the Iowa Senate by Senator Dickey during the 2026 legislative session. context
  • Malicious prosecution is a common-law tort claim that allows individuals to sue those who initiated prior legal proceedings against them wrongfully and without cause. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private parties involved in civil litigation

Individuals engaged in civil lawsuits gain the ability to file a malicious prosecution claim under newly defined standards without showing special injury.

Key Facts

  • A person may bring a civil action for malicious prosecution against a private party who initiated or caused to be initiated a civil action against them.
  • To prevail, the plaintiff must prove the underlying civil action was decided or dismissed in their favor, the defendant lacked probable cause, the defendant acted with malice, and the plaintiff suffered actual damages.
  • Malice is defined as the initiation of a civil action for a primary purpose other than securing a proper adjudication of the claim.
  • Probable cause is defined as the existence of reasonably known facts and law that would lead a reasonable person to believe, in good faith, that the civil action was legally and factually justified at initiation.
Show all 6 facts
  • Plaintiffs are not required to plead or prove arrest, seizure of property, restraint on liberty, issuance of an injunction, or any other heightened or special injury.
  • The statute applies exclusively to malicious prosecution actions between private parties and does not alter doctrines governing standing to challenge governmental or public wrongs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a plaintiff need to prove to win a malicious prosecution claim under this bill?
The plaintiff must prove that the underlying civil action was brought by the defendant and decided or dismissed in the plaintiff's favor, that the defendant lacked , that the defendant acted with , and that the plaintiff suffered actual damages proximately caused by the prosecution.
Does a plaintiff need to show that their property was seized or that they were arrested to file this claim?
No, the bill explicitly states that a plaintiff is not required to plead or prove arrest, seizure of property, restraint on liberty, issuance of an injunction, or any other heightened or special injury.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Mar 4, 2026Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends passage.
  2. Mar 3, 2026House
    Subcommittee Meeting: 03/04/2026 8:15AM House Lounge.
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    Subcommittee: Lawler, Olson and Watkins. H.J. 525 .
  4. Feb 25, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read first time, referred to Judiciary. H.J. 416 .
  5. Feb 24, 2026House
    Message from Senate. H.J. 399 .
  6. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Immediate message. S.J. 381 .
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026SenateFloor
    Passed Senate , yeas 29, nays 17. S.J. 381 .
  2. Feb 19, 2026Iowa Legislature
    Placed on calendar.
  3. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Committee report, recommending passage. S.J. 335 .
  4. Feb 9, 2026Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends passage.
  5. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Subcommittee Meeting: 02/09/2026 2:00PM Senate Lounge.
  6. Feb 4, 2026Senate
    Subcommittee: Bousselot, Blake, and Webster. S.J. 200 .
  7. Jan 29, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Judiciary. S.J. 169 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Codification of Private Malicious Prosecution Standards

The bill establishes explicit statutory definitions for malice and probable cause in the context of civil actions between private parties under section 611.24.

Connected Entities

General Assembly of the State of Iowa, Iowa
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Iowa“Legislative body enacting the statute”Map →
locationIowa“State where the legislation is enacted”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record