Senate Hearing on Native Youth Suicide Prevention
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to pressure federal agencies, specifically the Indian Health Service, to improve mental health outcomes and suicide prevention services for Native American youth.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Native American youth
They are the primary demographic experiencing the suicide crisis discussed in the hearing.
Indian Health Service
The agency is under congressional scrutiny regarding its performance and delivery of mental health services.
Tribal leaders
They are responsible for managing community health and safety in response to suicide clusters.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Youth suicide is the second leading cause of death for Indian youth aged 15 to 24.
- Native youth suicide rates are 2.5 times the national average as of 2012.
- The Pine Ridge Indian Reservation reported 11 suicides and 379 suicide attempts in the six months prior to the hearing.
- The White Mountain Apache Tribe and the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin were cited as examples of communities that have successfully reduced suicide numbers.
- The Committee criticized the Administration for submitting testimony late, only one day before the hearing.
- The hearing was the sixth formal committee hearing on this specific issue over a ten-year period.
Why It Matters
The hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to pressure federal agencies, specifically the Indian Health Service, to improve mental health outcomes and suicide prevention services for Native American youth.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was this hearing held?
What specific data was cited regarding the crisis?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift toward evidence-based oversight
The committee is explicitly moving away from general discussion toward demanding measurable, evidence-based results from federal agencies.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools