POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on College Affordability and Student-Centered Reforms

Original title: THE COST OF COLLEGE: STUDENT CENTERED REFORMS TO BRING HIGHER EDUCATION WITHIN REACH

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry into federal higher education policy, which influences student loan programs, institutional funding, and college access for millions of Americans.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

College Students

Students are the primary subjects of the proposed reforms regarding tuition costs and financial aid policies.

Higher Education Institutions

Colleges and universities are subject to federal policy changes that impact their funding and operational requirements.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a March 13, 2019, House Committee on Education and Labor hearing. Lawmakers and expert witnesses discussed strategies to reduce the cost of higher education and improve student outcomes.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 13, 2019, by the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor.
  • The session focused on 'student-centered reforms' to address the rising cost of higher education.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from academic institutions, research institutes, and student advocacy groups.
  • The record includes supplemental submissions from various organizations, including the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association.
  • The committee accepted written questions for the record from multiple members of Congress, with responses provided by witnesses Kvaal, Morrison-Shetlar, and Webber.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to examine the costs of higher education and discuss potential reforms to make college more accessible and affordable for students.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Dr. Elizabeth Akers (Manhattan Institute), Mr. James Kvaal (The Institute for College Access and Success), Ms. Jenae Parker (Franklin University), Dr. Alison Morrison-Shetlar (Western Carolina University), and Dr. Douglas Webber (Temple University).

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry into federal higher education policy, which influences student loan programs, institutional funding, and college access for millions of Americans.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Student-Centered Reform

The hearing title explicitly shifts the focus from institutional funding to 'student-centered' outcomes, reflecting a broader policy trend in 2019.

Connected Entities

personAlison Morrison-ShetlarInterim Chancellor of Western Carolina University and hearing witnessMap →
personElizabeth AkersSenior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and hearing witnessMap →
organizationCommittee on Education and LaborU.S. House of Representatives committee overseeing education policyMap →
personRobert C. ScottChairman of the Committee on Education and LaborMap →
personJames KvaalPresident of The Institute for College Access and Success and hearing witnessMap →
personJenae ParkerStudent and Board Member at Franklin University and hearing witnessMap →
personDouglas WebberAssociate Professor at Temple University and hearing witnessMap →
personVirginia FoxxRanking Member of the Committee on Education and LaborMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record