POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Iowa Senate Bill 2270 lifts restrictions allowing stricter environmental rules on animal feeding operations

Original title: A bill for an act regulating animal feeding operations, including rulemaking requirements, and making penalties applicable.

Last action · February 12, 2026: Introduced, referred to Agriculture. H.J. 273 .Sponsors: Art Staed and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate File 2270 removes existing legal barriers that prevent the state from enacting animal manure and effluent rules that are stricter than federal environmental standards. The bill requires the Environmental Protection Commission to adopt more restrictive standards when necessary to ensure state water quality standards are met, and removes administrative review exemptions for those rules.

Why it matters

Animal feeding operations and livestock producers face the possibility of stricter state regulations regarding manure storage, treatment, and land application than federal minimums require, carrying potential civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations.

Background
  • Animal feeding operations in Iowa are regulated under state water quality and livestock chapters administered by the Department of Natural Resources under the oversight of the Environmental Protection Commission. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Animal feeding operation owners and operators

Operations face potential new, more restrictive state rules regarding the storage, treatment, and application of manure and effluent, as well as exposure to daily civil penalties for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Environmental Protection Commission

The commission is explicitly required to adopt more restrictive rules than federal standards when necessary to protect state water quality, losing its exemption from certain periodic administrative rule reviews.

Key Facts

  • Senate File 2270 eliminates provisions that barred state environmental rules from being more stringent than federal EPA effluent standards.
  • The Environmental Protection Commission is directed to adopt more restrictive rules than federal baselines when necessary to ensure state water quality standards are met.
  • The bill removes statutory exemptions that previously shielded certain rules governing animal feeding operations from ordinary periodic comprehensive administrative review.
  • Confinement feeding operations and open feedlot operations qualifying as concentrated animal feeding operations must comply with state rules that may exceed federal NPDES permit minimum standards.
Show all 6 facts
  • Violations of Code chapter 459, subchapter III, subject a person to administrative civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each day of violation or judicial assessment of up to $5,000 per day.
  • Violations of Code chapter 459A are subject to judicial assessment of civil penalties of up to $5,000 for each day of violation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill change how animal waste is regulated in Iowa?
Yes. It removes restrictions that previously barred state regulators from issuing manure and effluent rules that are stricter than federal standards.
Will livestock producers face stricter requirements under this measure?
The bill requires the Environmental Protection Commission to adopt more restrictive rules than federal standards if necessary to ensure that state waters meet established water quality standards.
What are the penalties for violating these animal feeding operation regulations?
Violations can result in administrative civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day or judicial civil penalties of up to $5,000 per day depending on the specific statutory chapter violated.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Agriculture. H.J. 273 .
  2. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Subcommittee: Shipley, Rozenboom, and Staed. S.J. 279 .
  3. Feb 11, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Natural Resources and Environment. S.J. 250 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Removal of Federal Ceiling on State Environmental Rules

The measure shifts policy from treating federal effluent standards as a strict ceiling for animal feeding operations to treating them as a minimum standard that the state can exceed.

Connected Entities

Department of Natural Resources, Liz Bennett, Environmental Protection Commission and 3 more
OrganizationDepartment of Natural Resources“State department that administers and enforces water quality and animal feeding ”Map →
PersonLiz Bennett“Co-sponsor of Senate File 2270”Map →
OrganizationEnvironmental Protection Commission“State commission required to adopt rules regarding animal feeding operations”Map →
PersonHerman Quirmbach“Co-sponsor of Senate File 2270”Map →
PersonArt Staed“Primary sponsor of Senate File 2270”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Environmental Protection Agency“Federal agency administering the national pollutant discharge elimination system”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record