The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Massachusetts bill requires employment history screening and abuse background checks for school job applicants
Last action · December 18, 2025: Accompanied a study order (under JR10), see S2886Sponsors: Joan Lovely and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
School districts, charter schools, nonpublic schools, and s in Massachusetts are prohibited from offering employment to applicants for positions involving direct or regular contact with students without first requiring a detailed employment history, written authorization for disclosure, and background checks regarding past abuse, sexual misconduct, or disciplinary actions.
School administrators and contracted staff face new mandatory screening protocols and disclosure timelines, while prospective employees must disclose past investigations and disciplinary actions related to abuse or sexual misconduct.
- Senate Bill 1166 was introduced in the Massachusetts 194th session by Senator Joan B. Lovely and referred to the Judiciary committee. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
School job applicants
Applicants must submit detailed employment histories, authorize disclosures, and face disqualification from employment if they have substantiated abuse records or fail to provide required disclosures.
School districts and charter schools
Schools must conduct mandatory employment history reviews, check central registries, and follow specific provisional hiring limits before offering employment.
Contracted service providers
Contractors furnishing staff to schools must perform employment history reviews, maintain documentation, and inform schools of any known instances of abuse or sexual misconduct.
Former school employers
Former employers are required to disclose requested personnel information within specified timelines and receive statutory immunity for good-faith disclosures.
Key Facts
- Applicants for school positions involving direct or regular contact with students must provide a list of current and former school employers, written authorization for disclosure, and a statement detailing any past investigations or discipline regarding abuse or sexual misconduct.
- Schools and contractors must review an applicant's employment history by contacting past employers and checking the Central Registry of the department of children and families.
- A substantiated finding of physical or sexual abuse of a child from the department of children and families disqualifies an applicant from school employment.
- Former employers have up to 120 days to respond to initial requests for information and up to 90 days to provide additional requested material information.
Show all 8 facts
- Schools may hire applicants on a provisional basis for no more than 90 days pending the review of records, provided the applicant submits required information and signs an affirmation of eligibility.
- Employers who in good faith provide personnel records and information to a prospective school employer are granted immunity from criminal and civil liability.
- The office of the attorney general may assess a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for willful violations of the reporting and disclosure requirements.
- The department of education must gather data on reports of sexual misconduct and abuse, and report aggregated data annually to the legislature and public databases.
Frequently Asked Questions
What information must a job applicant provide to a prospective school employer?
Can a school hire an applicant before all background checks are completed?
What happens if a former employer fails to provide requested information?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
5 actions- Dec 18, 2025SenateAccompanied a study order (under JR10), see S2886
- Oct 20, 2025JointHearing scheduled for 06/17/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
- Jun 11, 2025JointHearing scheduled for 06/17/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
- Feb 27, 2025HouseHouse concurred
- Feb 27, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to the committee on The Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Companion Study Order Action
The bill was accompanied by a study order under Joint Rule 10, redirecting the measure for further legislative study under document S2886.
Sources
malegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy35Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
