Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing: National Security Strategy and Secretary of Defense Nomination
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The committee's favorable vote advances the nomination of the Secretary of Defense to the full Senate floor for a final confirmation decision.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Ashton B. Carter
His nomination for Secretary of Defense was advanced to the full Senate for a vote.
Senate Armed Services Committee Members
Committee members participated in the roll call vote to advance the nomination.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The committee voted 25-0 to report the nomination of Dr. Ashton B. Carter for Secretary of Defense favorably to the Senate floor.
- The hearing took place on February 10, 2015, in the Hart Senate Office Building.
- The committee received testimony from the National Defense Panel regarding U.S. national security strategy.
- The National Defense Panel is composed of former military leaders, Members of Congress, and Pentagon officials.
- The committee chairman noted that the nomination could potentially reach the Senate floor for a vote as early as the following day.
Why It Matters
The committee's favorable vote advances the nomination of the Secretary of Defense to the full Senate floor for a final confirmation decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was Dr. Ashton B. Carter confirmed as Secretary of Defense during this meeting?
What was the purpose of the National Defense Panel's testimony?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Bipartisan Consensus on Defense
The committee demonstrated unanimous support for the Secretary of Defense nominee, reflecting a high level of bipartisan consensus on the appointment.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools