1962 Senate Hearings on Coal Pipeline Eminent Domain (S. 3044)
July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill proposed granting private coal pipeline companies the legal authority to seize private property for pipeline construction, which would have established a new precedent for energy infrastructure development in the United States.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Coal pipeline companies
The bill would grant these entities the legal authority to exercise eminent domain to acquire land.
Private landowners
These individuals would be subject to the potential seizure of their property for pipeline infrastructure if the bill were enacted.
Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- S. 3044 proposed amending the Interstate Commerce Act to grant eminent domain rights to coal pipeline carriers.
- The hearings were conducted by the Senate Committee on Commerce during the 87th Congress.
- Hearings took place over six days: April 18, May 1, May 2, May 3, May 4, and May 21, 1962.
- The bill specifically targeted carriers of coal by pipeline subject to Part 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act.
Why It Matters
The bill proposed granting private coal pipeline companies the legal authority to seize private property for pipeline construction, which would have established a new precedent for energy infrastructure development in the United States.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of S. 3044?
When did these hearings occur?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Eminent Domain
The bill represents an attempt to extend traditional government eminent domain powers to private commercial entities for the purpose of energy transport.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools