POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Alabama expands Indian Affairs Commission membership, funding eligibility, and executive director requirements

Original title: Alabama Indian Affairs Commission; commission authority and membership revised, additional tribes recognized

Last action · January 14, 2026: Pending Committee Action in House of OriginSponsor: Marcus Paramore

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 222 expands the Alabama Indian Affairs Commission from seven to at least eleven members, recognizes two additional tribes, and authorizes the commission to directly seek and receive state appropriations. The measure takes effect on October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

The legislation alters the governing structure and financial access of the state's official indigenous affairs body, directly affecting representation for nine recognized tribes and setting salary limits and eligibility rules for the commission's top administrative post.

Background
  • The Alabama Indian Affairs Commission was established to study and coordinate programs concerning Indian affairs within the state. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Alabama Indian Affairs Commission

The commission's membership size, funding sources, and executive director qualifications are altered by the legislation.

Directly affected

Recognized Indian tribes, bands, or groups in Alabama

Tribal representation on the commission is expanded to nine groups, and membership records are protected from compelled disclosure.

Directly affected

Executive Director of the Alabama Indian Affairs Commission

The executive director is subject to new statutory age, residency, and salary pay grade cap requirements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many tribes are represented on the Alabama Indian Affairs Commission under this bill?
The bill increases the number of represented tribes from seven to nine.
Can the commission receive state funding under the proposed law?
Yes, the bill authorizes the commission to directly seek and receive state appropriations, grants, and funds alongside federal benefits.
Are tribal membership records required to be handed over to outside membership organizations?
No, the commission is explicitly protected from being compelled to provide tribal rolls, genealogy, or membership information to any membership organization.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  2. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on State Government

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of State Financial Backing for Tribal Affairs

The bill marks a shift by explicitly allowing the commission to seek state-level appropriations alongside traditional federal funding sources.

Connected Entities

Piqua Shawnee Tribe of Alabama, Joint Committee on Administrative Regulations, Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe of Alabama and 9 more
OrganizationPiqua Shawnee Tribe of Alabama“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Administrative Regulations“Committee that administers the commission under Section 41-22-22.”Map →
OrganizationMa-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe of Alabama“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationSoutheast Mvskoke Nation“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationUnited Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationMowa Band of Choctaws of southwest Alabama“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationCherokees of northeast Alabama“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationChero-Creek Intratribal Indians“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationAlabama Indian Affairs Commission“The state commission whose authority, membership, and funding provisions are rev”Map →
OrganizationState Personnel Board“Board that provides the personnel Merit System pay plan under Section 36-6-5.”Map →
OrganizationEchota Cherokees of Alabama“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →
OrganizationPoarch Band of Creeks of Escambia County“Recognized tribe entitled to one member on the commission.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance55
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record