POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana Bill HB 1419 requires self-service storage facilities to implement security measures and prohibits deceptive security advertising

Original title: Self-service storage facilities.

Last action · January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic DevelopmentSponsor: Philip GiaQuinta

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Storage facility owners are required to install video surveillance, adequate lighting, and secure perimeters to prevent property theft, starting July 1, 2026. False or misleading advertising regarding these security measures is classified as a deceptive consumer act actionable by the attorney general.

Why it matters

Renters gain legal protection against property theft and misleading advertising from storage operators, while facility owners face enforcement penalties and potential liability from the state for noncompliance.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

self-service storage facility owners

Storage facility owners must install video surveillance, adequate lighting, and secure perimeters, and they face legal liability and penalties from the attorney general for deceptive advertising regarding security.

Directly affected

renters of self-service storage spaces

Renters receive statutory protections requiring facilities to maintain security measures and prohibiting misleading advertising about those measures.

Key Facts

  • Storage facility owners must implement adequate security measures to prevent the theft of a renter's personal property stored in a rented space.
  • Mandated security measures include installing a video surveillance system covering all areas, ensuring all areas are well lit, and ensuring the perimeter is secure.
  • Engaging in false, deceptive, or misleading advertising relating to facility security measures is classified as a deceptive act.
  • Deceptive advertising regarding facility security is actionable by the attorney general under IC 24-5-0.5, subjecting violators to available penalties and remedies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific security measures must self-service storage facilities implement under HB 1419?
Facilities must install a video surveillance system covering all areas, ensure all areas are well lit, and ensure that the facility's perimeter is secure.
What happens if a storage facility misrepresents its security measures in advertisements?
False, deceptive, or misleading advertising about security measures constitutes a that is actionable by the attorney general under IC 24-5-0.5.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development
  2. Jan 8, 2026House
    Authored by Representative GiaQuinta

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development, Philip GiaQuinta
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development“House committee to which the bill was referred”Map →
PersonPhilip GiaQuinta“Representative who sponsored HB 1419”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 55)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record