POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Subcommittee Hearing on Energy Efficiency and Accountability

Original title: DISCUSSION DRAFT ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PERSPECTIVES ON TITLE IV: ENERGY EFFICIENCY

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing served as a formal review of proposed legislative changes to federal energy efficiency mandates and oversight of energy policy, which could impact future utility regulations and energy standards for consumers.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Energy

The agency is subject to the proposed accountability and efficiency standards discussed in the draft legislation.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The commission provides oversight and enforcement of energy policy, which the draft legislation seeks to modify.

American Public Power Association

The association represents public power utilities that would be impacted by changes to energy efficiency and accountability regulations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House on Energy and Power held a two-day hearing in June 2015 to discuss draft legislation regarding energy efficiency standards and federal agency accountability. The hearing included testimony from Department of Energy and FERC officials, as well as representatives from the power industry.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 3 and June 4, 2015.
  • The subcommittee reviewed a discussion draft titled 'Title IV: Energy Efficiency and Accountability'.
  • The draft is divided into Subtitle A (Energy Efficiency) and Subtitle B (Accountability).
  • Testimony was provided by officials from the Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
  • Industry stakeholders, including the American Public Power Association and the Electric Power Supply Association, provided testimony on the second day.
  • The hearing was held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why It Matters

This hearing served as a formal review of proposed legislative changes to federal energy efficiency mandates and oversight of energy policy, which could impact future utility regulations and energy standards for consumers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss and gather feedback on a draft bill concerning energy efficiency standards and accountability measures for federal energy agencies.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the Department of Energy and FERC, as well as leaders from various power industry associations and companies.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Legislative Focus on Accountability

The inclusion of a specific 'Accountability' subtitle suggests a legislative push to increase oversight of federal energy agencies during the 114th Congress.

Connected Entities

personEd WhitfieldChairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and PowerMap →
personJ. Arnold QuinnDirector, Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, FERCMap →
organizationFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal agency providing testimony on energy policy and enforcementMap →
organizationDepartment of EnergyFederal department providing testimony on energy efficiencyMap →
personSusan N. KellyCEO of the American Public Power AssociationMap →
personLarry R. ParkinsonDirector, Office of Enforcement, FERCMap →
personKathleen HoganDeputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency at the Department of EnergyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance50
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record