The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota allocates $1.33 million in state bonds for Stillwater Washington Avenue intersection improvements
Last action · February 10, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital InvestmentSponsor: Josiah Hill
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Stillwater; Washington Avenue intersection improvement funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
City of Stillwater
Receives a state grant of $1,331,000 to design, engineer, and construct intersection and roadway safety improvements.
Commissioner of Transportation
Receives the bond proceeds appropriation to issue a grant to the city of Stillwater.
Commissioner of Management and Budget
Required to sell and issue up to $1,331,000 in state bonds to provide the appropriated money.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money is being provided for the Stillwater intersection project?
Where does the funding come from?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
- Controversy5Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment2Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
