POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing: The Future of the Banking System

Original title: THE FUTURE OF BANKING: HOW CONSOLIDATION, NONBANK COMPETITION, AND TECHNOLOGY ARE RESHAPING THE BANKING SYSTEM

Record date · January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a September 2021 House subcommittee hearing regarding how technology, industry , and non-bank competitors are changing the U.S. banking landscape. The hearing featured testimony from industry experts, bank executives, and consumer advocates.

Why it matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into how evolving financial technologies and market shifts impact consumer access to banking services and the stability of the financial system.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Banking Industry

The industry is subject to ongoing legislative review regarding how technology and consolidation affect their operations and regulatory environment.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers are affected by changes in how banking services are delivered, the cost of financial products, and the availability of credit.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 29, 2021, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The session focused on three primary drivers of change in banking: consolidation, nonbank competition, and technology.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from academia, banking institutions, and consumer advocacy groups.
  • The record includes written statements from various industry associations, including the American Financial Services Association and the Bank Policy Institute.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing was held under the 117th Congress, Serial No. 117-49.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine how the banking system is being reshaped by new technology, the rise of non-bank financial companies, and the of traditional banks.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Paulina Gonzalez-Brito (California Reinvestment Coalition), Makada Henry-Nickie (Brookings Institution), Sarah Jane Hughes (Indiana University), Desiree Jackson (Beneficial State Bank), and Jim Reuter (FirstBank/American Bankers Association).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Nonbank Competition

The hearing highlights a shift in legislative focus from traditional bank oversight to the impact of fintech and non-bank entities on the financial ecosystem.

Connected Entities

Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions, Paulina Gonzalez-Brito, Sarah Jane Hughes and 5 more
OrganizationSubcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions“The body conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonPaulina Gonzalez-Brito“Executive Director, California Reinvestment Coalition”Map →
PersonSarah Jane Hughes“University Scholar and Fellow in Commercial Law, Indiana University”Map →
PersonMakada Henry-Nickie“Fellow, Governance Studies, Brookings Institution”Map →
PersonBlaine Luetkemeyer“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonEd Perlmutter“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions”Map →
PersonDesiree Jackson“Assistant Vice President, Beneficial State Bank”Map →
PersonJim Reuter“CEO, FirstBank, representing the American Bankers Association”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record