POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Idaho preempts local firearms rules, imposing $10,000 penalties and legal action for violations

Original title: FIREARMS – Amends existing law to revise a provision regarding preemption of firearms regulation, to provide a penalty, and to provide for a cause of action.

Last action · April 2, 2026: Signed by Governor on 04/02/26 Session Law Chapter 295 Effective: 04/02/2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Idaho law now completely preempts local firearms regulations, barring cities and counties from enacting local rules on gun sales, possession, or transport while imposing a $10,000 civil penalty and a private right of action for violations. The measure took effect immediately upon passage and approval on April 2, 2026.

Why it matters

Local governments face financial penalties and lawsuits if they maintain rules restricting firearms outside state-approved exceptions, shifting regulatory authority entirely to the state level.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Counties and Cities

Local governments are barred from enacting or enforcing firearm regulations outside narrow exceptions and face civil penalties and lawsuits for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Gun Owners and Advocacy Organizations

Individuals and groups are granted the right to maintain legal actions against local jurisdictions that violate state firearms preemption.

Not affected

Department of Fish and Game

The statute explicitly states it shall not be construed to affect the agency's authority to make rules concerning wildlife management.

Key Facts

  • The state legislature claims total occupancy of the field of firearms regulation within Idaho.
  • Counties, cities, agencies, boards, and political subdivisions are prohibited from adopting or enforcing any law, rule, or ordinance regulating firearms, components, or ammunition, except as expressly authorized by state statute.
  • Any unauthorized local firearm rule is void, unenforceable, and subject to a permanent injunction.
  • Counties retain the authority to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the discharge of firearms with specific statutory exemptions for lawful self-defense, hunting, landowners, sport shooting ranges, and target shooting on public land.
Show all 11 facts
  • Cities retain the authority to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the discharge of firearms with exemptions for lawful self-defense and sport shooting ranges.
  • Local political subdivisions that willfully and knowingly violate the preemption statute are subject to a $10,000 civil penalty per violation.
  • The attorney general or any adversely affected person or organization may maintain an action for damages, declaratory relief, or permanent injunctive relief against offending jurisdictions.
  • Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable costs and attorney's fees upon prevailing or if the local rule is repealed after a lawsuit is filed.
  • Potential plaintiffs must provide 30 days of advanced written notice to the attorney general, who has 30 days to investigate and give the offending jurisdiction 30 days to cure the violation.
  • The statute does not affect the Department of Fish and Game's wildlife management authority or the authority of local governments to regulate the location and construction of sport shooting ranges.
  • The act took effect immediately upon passage and approval on April 2, 2026, due to an emergency declaration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can local cities and counties still regulate firearm discharge?
Yes, counties and cities may regulate, restrict, or prohibit the discharge of firearms within their boundaries, provided their ordinances do not apply to lawful self-defense, hunting, landowner activities, sport shooting ranges, or target shooting on public land under specified conditions.
What happens if a local government enacts an illegal firearm rule?
The rule is void and unenforceable, and the local political subdivision is subject to a $10,000 civil penalty per violation, along with potential lawsuits for damages, , or s.
Who can file a lawsuit against a local government for violating firearms preemption?
The attorney general or any person or organization whose membership is adversely affected by the local rule may maintain an action, after giving required advance notice.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor on 04/02/26 Session Law Chapter 295 Effective: 04/02/2026
  2. Apr 1, 2026
    Reported delivered to Governor at 6:50 p.m. on 04/01/26
  3. Apr 1, 2026
    Reported signed by the Speaker & ordered delivered to Governor
  4. Apr 1, 2026
    Received from Senate; Signed by Speaker; Returned to Senate
  5. Apr 1, 2026
    Reported enrolled; signed by President; to House for signature of Speaker
  6. Apr 1, 2026Committee
    Returned From House Passed; referred to enrolling
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Apr 1, 2026Floor
    Rules Suspended: Ayes 69 Nays 0 Abs/Excd 1, read in full as required – PASSED - 60-8-2 AYES – Alfieri, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Bingham, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon(Cannon), Cayler, Cheatum, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Garner, Hall(Stone), Handy, Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill(Hill), Holtzclaw, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen, Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Raymond, Redman, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts(Batt), Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Vander Woude, Veile, Weber, Wisniewski, Mr. Speaker NAYS – Church, Egbert(Beazer), Galaviz, Gannon, Green, Haws, Mathias, Rubel Absent – Berch, Wheeler Floor Sponsor - Boyle Title apvd - to Senate
  2. Apr 1, 2026
    Read second time; Filed for Third Reading
  3. Mar 31, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading
  4. Mar 30, 2026Introduced
    Read First Time, Referred to State Affairs
  5. Mar 30, 2026
    Received from the Senate, Filed for First Reading
  6. Mar 30, 2026Floor
    Read third time in full – PASSED - 31-3-1 AYES – Anthon, Bernt, Bjerke(Bjerke), Blaylock, Burtenshaw, Carlson, Cook, Den Hartog, Foreman, Galloway, Grow, Guthrie, Harris, Hart, Keyser, Kohl, Lakey, Lenney, Lent, Nichols, Okuniewicz, Ricks, Ruchti, Semmelroth, Shippy, Toews, VanOrden, Ward-Engelking, Woodward, Zito, Zuiderveld NAYS – Rabe, Taylor, Wintrow Absent and excused – Adams Floor Sponsor - Keyser Title apvd - to House
  7. Mar 27, 2026
    Read second time; filed for Third Reading
  8. Mar 26, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation; Filed for second reading
  9. Mar 25, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed; referred to State Affairs
  10. Mar 24, 2026Introduced
    Introduced; read first time; referred to JR for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Total State Preemption of Firearms Regulation

The legislation asserts complete state occupancy over firearms regulation, removing local authority and instituting mandatory civil penalties and attorney fees for non-compliant municipalities.

Connected Entities

Department of Fish and Game, Judiciary and Rules Committee, United States Constitution
OrganizationDepartment of Fish and Game“Retains authority to make rules concerning wildlife management.”Map →
OrganizationJudiciary and Rules Committee“Senate committee that introduced Senate Bill 1430.”Map →
otherUnited States Constitution“Amendment 2 guarantees the right to bear arms.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record