POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofHaiti
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on U.S. Policy Toward Haiti (July 2015)

Original title: OVERVIEW OF U.S. POLICY TOWARDS HAITI PRIOR TO THE ELECTIONS

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides oversight on the management of over $6 billion in U.S. taxpayer-funded aid provided to Haiti since the 2010 earthquake and examines the U.S. government's role in supporting democratic processes in the region.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Haitian-American community

The community is impacted by the stability and political conditions of their country of origin.

U.S. taxpayers

Taxpayers provide the $6 billion in aid that is subject to congressional oversight and potential mismanagement.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This Senate hearing reviewed U.S. foreign policy, aid, and democratic stability in Haiti ahead of the country's August 2015 elections. The session featured testimony from the State Department's Special Coordinator for Haiti regarding recovery efforts following the 2010 earthquake and concerns over political governance.

Key Facts

  • The U.S. government has provided over $6 billion in aid to Haiti since the 2010 earthquake.
  • The hearing was held on July 15, 2015, to discuss the political climate ahead of Haitian elections scheduled for August 8, 2015.
  • The subcommittee expressed concern regarding reports of mismanagement of both public and private aid in Haiti.
  • The hearing addressed the suspension of Haitian elections originally scheduled for October 26, 2014.
  • The subcommittee noted concerns regarding President Martelly's previous decision to rule by decree.
  • The hearing identified ongoing challenges in Haiti, including a weak judicial system, corruption, and political violence.
  • The hearing record includes responses from Thomas C. Adams to questions submitted by Senator Bob Corker.
  • A letter from Frederica S. Wilson was submitted for the record by Senator Marco Rubio.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To review U.S. policy, resources, and priorities in Haiti leading up to the August 2015 elections.
How much aid has the U.S. provided to Haiti?
The document states the U.S. government has provided more than $6 billion in aid since the 2010 earthquake.
What concerns were raised about the Haitian government?
Senators expressed concern over the suspension of previous elections, the practice of ruling by decree, a weak judicial system, and reports of aid mismanagement.

Why It Matters

The hearing provides oversight on the management of over $6 billion in U.S. taxpayer-funded aid provided to Haiti since the 2010 earthquake and examines the U.S. government's role in supporting democratic processes in the region.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transition from Earthquake Recovery to Election Oversight

The hearing marks a shift in focus from immediate post-earthquake humanitarian aid to the long-term stability of democratic institutions in Haiti.

Connected Entities

locationHaitiSubject of the policy reviewMap →
personMarco RubioChairman of the Subcommittee on Western HemisphereMap →
personMichel MartellyPresident of Haiti at the time of the hearingMap →
personBarbara BoxerU.S. Senator from CaliforniaMap →
personFrederica S. WilsonSubmitted a letter for the recordMap →
personThomas C. AdamsSpecial Coordinator for Haiti, U.S. Department of StateMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record