POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofU.S. Territories →
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on U.S. Territories and Palau Agreement

Original title: ISSUES FACING U.S.-AFFILIATED ISLANDS AS REPORTED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE AND CONSIDERATION OF TWO MEASURES RELATED TO U.S.-AFFILIATED ISLANDS: S. 2360, THE OMNIBUS TERRITORIES ACT OF 2015, AND S. 2610, A BILL TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU

January 1, 2017

U.S. TerritoriesForeign PolicyPalauCompact of Free AssociationGovernment Accountability OfficeFederal Budget

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the legislative path for continued U.S. financial assistance to Palau through 2024 and reviews the impact of compact migrants on U.S. states and territories.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Republic of Palau

The nation is awaiting legislative approval of a 2010 agreement that dictates long-term U.S. financial assistance.

Compact Migrants

The committee is reviewing the impact of these individuals on the services and infrastructure of U.S. states and territories.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing to review GAO reports on U.S.-affiliated islands and discuss two legislative measures: the Omnibus Territories Act of 2015 and a bill to approve a 2010 agreement with the Republic of Palau.

Key Facts

  • The committee reviewed S. 2360 (Omnibus Territories Act of 2015) and S. 2610 (Palau agreement approval).
  • The proposed financial assistance agreement with Palau extends through Fiscal Year 2024.
  • The total cost of the Palau agreement is estimated at $150 million over ten years, reduced from an initial $240 million.
  • Congress has provided over $13 million in annual discretionary funding for Palau since the 2010 agreement was signed, totaling approximately $90 million to date.
  • Palau has a population of approximately 21,000, with about 500 citizens serving in the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • The hearing included a review of GAO reports regarding compacts of free association with the Marshall Islands and Micronesia.
  • The committee examined the impact of compact migrants on U.S. states and territories.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of S. 2610?
It is a bill intended to formally approve the 2010 agreement between the United States and the Republic of Palau, which includes financial assistance.
Why is the funding for Palau being discussed?
The committee is seeking an acceptable and viable budget to pay for the financial assistance promised in the 2010 agreement.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the legislative path for continued U.S. financial assistance to Palau through 2024 and reviews the impact of compact migrants on U.S. states and territories.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection90% confidence

Palau Funding Gap

The U.S. has been providing discretionary funding for the Palau agreement while awaiting formal legislative approval of the 2010 agreement.

Republic of Palau

Connected Entities

locationRepublic of Palau“Nation with a compact of free association with the U.S.”Map →
personMaria Cantwell“U.S. Senator from Washington, Ranking Member.”Map →
personEsther Kia'aina“Assistant Secretary for Insular Areas, U.S. Department of the Interior.”Map →
personDavid Gootnick“Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. Government Accountability Office”Map →
personCory Gardner“U.S. Senator from Colorado, presiding over the hearing.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record