POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Kansas HB 2270 Updates IT Services, CISO Audit Reporting, and Procurement Rules

Original title: AN ACT concerning information technology; relating to services provided by the chief information technology officer; authorizing the chief information security officer to receive audit reports; amending K.S.A. 46-1135, 75-4704, 75-4705 and 75-4709 and K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 75-7205 and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · February 19, 2026: Stricken from Calendar by Rule 1507

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill authorizes the chief information security officer to receive information technology audit reports, updates the responsibilities of the chief information technology officer regarding state agency IT services and equipment, and amends multiple related statutes.

Why it matters

State executive agencies face updated statutory rules regarding centralized cloud computing, telecommunications procurement, and the distribution of IT security audit reports to oversight officials.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Agencies

Executive branch agencies must route IT procurement over $75,000, software registrations, and telecommunications services through or with the approval of the executive chief information technology officer.

Directly affected

Executive Chief Information Technology Officer

The officer gains expanded authority and duties regarding oversight, telecommunications coordination, inventory databases, and data center location requirements.

Directly affected

Chief Information Security Officer

The officer is explicitly authorized to receive written reports on information technology audits.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who must approve major IT equipment purchases by executive agencies?
Any procurement of central processing units or distributed computing equipment with a cost of $75,000 or more by an executive branch division, department, or agency must be approved by the executive branch chief information technology officer.
Are state universities subject to the centralized data processing rules?
No, the centralized data processing requirements do not apply to the universities under the jurisdiction and control of the state board of regents.
Where are third-party data centers required to be located?
All third-party data centers must be maintained at locations within the United States or with companies that are based in the United States.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Feb 19, 2026House
    Stricken from Calendar by Rule 1507
  2. Feb 17, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by
  3. Mar 5, 2025House
    Hearing: Wednesday, March 5, 2025, 9:00 AM — Room 218-N — CANCELED
  4. Feb 19, 2025House
    Withdrawn from Calendar, Rereferred to House Committee on Legislative Modernization
  5. Feb 18, 2025HouseFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed by
  6. Feb 17, 2025House
    Hearing: Monday, February 17, 2025, 9:00 AM — Room 218-N
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Feb 12, 2025House
    Hearing: Wednesday, February 12, 2025, 9:00 AM — Room 218-N — CANCELED
  2. Feb 5, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Feb 5, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Legislative Modernization

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Kansas, Kansas Supreme Court, United States and 2 more
locationKansas“State jurisdiction”Map →
OrganizationKansas Supreme Court“Receives audit reports if judicial entity is audited”Map →
locationUnited States“Location requirement for third-party data centers”Map →
OrganizationKansas National Guard“May perform vulnerability assessments upon request”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record