Part ofonline safety →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Senate Hearing on Protecting Children Online

Original title: PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN ONLINE

January 1, 2023

online safety social media child protection mental health internet regulation

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This serves as a foundational step for potential future federal legislation that could change how social media companies are held liable for content and design features affecting minors.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Social Media Companies

These companies are the subject of proposed regulatory oversight and potential liability changes discussed during the hearing.

Parents and Minors

The policies discussed aim to change the digital environment and safety protections for children using online platforms.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a on February 14, 2023, to examine the impact of social media platforms on children's safety and mental health. The session included testimony from advocates, child safety experts, and psychologists regarding potential legislative and regulatory approaches to online protection.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on February 14, 2023, in the Hart Senate Office Building.
The committee received testimony from six primary witnesses representing advocacy groups, child safety organizations, and the psychological community.
The record includes written statements and responses to follow-up questions from Senators Whitehouse, Tillis, and Welch.
The committee accepted multiple miscellaneous submissions for the record, including letters from RAINN and various academic and legal experts.
The hearing focused on the intersection of social media design, child exploitation, and mental health outcomes.

Why It Matters

This serves as a foundational step for potential future federal legislation that could change how social media companies are held liable for content and design features affecting minors.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?

To gather expert testimony and evidence regarding the risks children face on social media platforms to inform potential legislative action.

Who testified at the hearing?

Witnesses included Kristin Bride (advocate), Michelle C. DeLaune (NCMEC), Josh Golin (Fairplay), Emma Lembke (Log Off Movement), John Pizzuro (Raven), and Dr. Mitch J. Prinstein (American Psychological Association).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Bipartisan Focus on Tech Regulation

The hearing demonstrates a rare alignment between Democratic and Republican committee members on the necessity of regulating social media platforms for child safety.

Richard J. Durbin Lindsey O. Graham

Connected Entities

personKristin Bride“Survivor parent and social media reform advocate.”Map →

organizationSenate Committee on the Judiciary“The committee conducting the hearing.”Map →

personMichelle C. DeLaune“CEO of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.”Map →

personMitch J. Prinstein“Chief Science Officer of the American Psychological Association.”Map →

personLindsey O. Graham“Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.”Map →

personRichard J. Durbin“Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.”Map →

personEmma Lembke“Founder of the Log Off Movement.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance85
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy60
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment20
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz40
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools