POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Data Security and Breach Notification Legislation

Original title: GETTING IT RIGHT ON DATA SECURITY AND BREACH NOTIFICATION LEGISLATION IN THE 114TH CONGRESS

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explored the creation of a uniform federal standard for data s, which would impact how businesses across the U.S. must report compromised consumer information and potentially override varying state-level notification laws.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Consumers

Consumers are affected by the standards governing how and when they are notified if their personal data is compromised.

Businesses and Financial Institutions

These entities are affected by potential new federal requirements for data protection and mandatory breach reporting procedures.

State Attorneys General

State officials are affected by potential federal legislation that could preempt or change existing state-level data breach notification laws.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 Senate subcommittee hearing regarding potential federal legislation for data security and how companies must notify consumers during data breaches. Industry experts, academic leaders, and state officials provided testimony to help shape future federal policy.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 5, 2015, in the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • The session was held by the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, and Data Security.
  • The primary objective was to discuss legislative approaches to data security and breach notification requirements.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the technology sector, retail industry, banking sector, academia, and state government.
  • The hearing included formal prepared statements from six primary witnesses and additional submissions for the record.
  • The committee accepted written responses to follow-up questions from witnesses including Cheri F. McGuire, Mallory B. Duncan, Doug Johnson, and Yael Weinman.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather expert testimony on how to craft federal legislation regarding data security and the rules companies must follow when notifying consumers of a data breach.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from Symantec, the National Retail Federation, Brown University, the American Bankers Association, the Illinois Attorney General, and the Information Technology Industry Council.

Why It Matters

The hearing explored the creation of a uniform federal standard for data s, which would impact how businesses across the U.S. must report compromised consumer information and potentially override varying state-level notification laws.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal vs. State Authority

The hearing highlights the ongoing tension in 2015 regarding whether federal data security standards should replace or supplement existing state-level notification laws.

Connected Entities

organizationAmerican Bankers AssociationRepresented by Doug JohnsonMap →
organizationNational Retail FederationRepresented by Mallory B. DuncanMap →
personJerry MoranU.S. Senator from Kansas and Chairman of the SubcommitteeMap →
organizationInformation Technology Industry CouncilRepresented by Yael WeinmanMap →
organizationBrown UniversityRepresented by Ravi PendseMap →
organizationSymantec CorporationRepresented by Cheri F. McGuireMap →
personLisa MadiganAttorney General of IllinoisMap →
personRichard BlumenthalU.S. Senator from Connecticut and Ranking MemberMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record