POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part oflobbying →
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Suter and Associates for South Tahoe Public Utility District

Original title: SUTER AND ASSOCIATES LYNN M. lobbying for SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

June 20, 2026

lobbyingpublic utilitiesgovernment spending

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report identifies how much public utility funding was spent on professional services to influence specific California state legislation between January and March 2000.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

South Tahoe Public Utility District ratepayers

The district uses funds to pay for lobbying services that may impact utility-related legislation.

Suter and Associates

The firm received payment for professional lobbying services provided to the district.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses activities and payments made by the South Tahoe Public Utility District to the firm Suter and Associates for the first quarter of 2000. It lists the specific state legislative bills that were the focus of the lobbying efforts.

Key Facts

  • The South Tahoe Public Utility District paid $4,909.11 for lobbying services during the period of January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2000.
  • The lobbying firm Suter and Associates was retained to represent the district.
  • The lobbying activity focused on Assembly Bills (AB) 126, 237, 446, 1189, and 1812.
  • The lobbying activity focused on Senate Bills (SB) 192, 201, 272, 598, 1008, 1132, and 1522.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did the South Tahoe Public Utility District spend on lobbying in early 2000?
The district paid $4,909.11 to Suter and Associates for the period covering January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
Which bills were being lobbied?
The efforts covered a total of 12 bills, including Assembly Bills 126, 237, 446, 1189, 1812 and Senate Bills 192, 201, 272, 598, 1008, 1132, and 1522.

Why It Matters

This report identifies how much public utility funding was spent on professional services to influence specific California state legislation between January and March 2000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

SUTER AND ASSOCIATES LYNN M.

on behalf of SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

Senate LDAView filing →

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Broad Legislative Focus

The utility district tracked a high volume of 12 distinct bills in a single quarter, suggesting an active interest in a wide range of state legislative activity.

South Tahoe Public Utility District

Connected Entities

organizationSouth Tahoe Public Utility District“The client entity paying for lobbying services.”Map →
organizationSuter and Associates“Lobbying firm hired by the utility district.”Map →
personLynn M. Suter“Individual associated with the lobbying firm.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record