POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts House Bill 2116 clarifies employer definition in public employee anti-retaliation statute

Original title: An Act relative to anti-retaliation protections for public employees

Last action · January 12, 2026: Read second and ordered to a third readingSponsor: Ken Gordon

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2116 amends Section 148A of Chapter 149 of the to clarify the definition of 'employer' by explicitly cross-referencing Section 148 for public employee .

Why it matters

The measure establishes a precise statutory definition for employers under the state's public employee anti-retaliation law, aligning it with existing labor definitions in Chapter 149 for public sector workers.

Background
  • House Bill 2116 was introduced during the 195th session of the Massachusetts General Court and referred to the Committee on Labor and Workforce Development. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public employees

Public employees are subject to revised statutory definitions governing anti-retaliation protections in their workplaces.

Directly affected

Public-sector employers

Public employers are governed by the clarified definition of employer under the state labor code.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What statute does House Bill 2116 amend?
House Bill 2116 amends Section 148A of Chapter 149 of the .
How does the bill define 'employer' for anti-retaliation protections?
The bill applies the definition of 'employer' as that term is defined in Section 148 of Chapter 149.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Jan 12, 2026House
    Read second and ordered to a third reading
  2. Jan 12, 2026House
    Rules suspended
  3. Jan 12, 2026House
    Committee reported that the matter be placed in the Orders of the Day for the next sitting
  4. Dec 22, 2025HouseCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling
  5. Sep 8, 2025House
    Reporting date extended to Wednesday, December 3, 2025
  6. Jun 12, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 06/18/2025 from 01:00 PM-04:00 PM in B-1
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  2. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Labor and Workforce Development

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Laws
OrganizationGeneral Laws“Mentioned as the legal compilation being amended by the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance35
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record