The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on Supreme Court Ethics and Recusal Reforms
Record date · January 1, 2022
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The House Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet held a hearing on April 27, 2022, to discuss potential ethics and reforms for the U.S. Supreme Court. The session featured testimony from legal experts and advocacy groups regarding the current standards for judicial conduct and transparency.
This hearing explores potential legislative changes to the ethical standards and requirements for Supreme Court Justices, which could alter how conflicts of interest are managed at the highest level of the judiciary.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Any legislative changes to ethics or recusal rules would directly govern the conduct and legal obligations of the Justices.
Legal Advocacy Groups
Organizations like Fix the Court and the Alliance for Justice are involved in shaping the public and legislative discourse regarding judicial standards.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on April 27, 2022, before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
- The primary subject was the evaluation of ethics and recusal reforms for the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Four witnesses provided oral and written testimony: Gabe Roth, Donald K. Sherman, Mark R. Paoletta, and Stephen Gillers.
- Multiple external documents were entered into the record, including statements from the Project On Government Oversight, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and the Alliance for Justice.
Show all 6 facts
- The hearing included the submission of a GAO report and a letter from Senator Chris Van Hollen by Representative Eric Swalwell.
- A statement from The Heritage Foundation was submitted for the record by Representative Jim Jordan.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Judicial Transparency
The hearing highlights a concerted effort by the House Judiciary Subcommittee to apply greater legislative scrutiny to Supreme Court internal ethics policies.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools