Senate Hearing on Canyonlands and Glen Canyon Boundaries (1970)
July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing initiated the legislative process to define the official boundaries and management status of these major public land areas, directly impacting federal land administration and recreational access in Utah and Arizona.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Residents of Utah and Arizona
The proposed legislation changes the legal boundaries and management status of public lands within these states.
National Park Service
The agency is responsible for the administration of the lands subject to the proposed boundary and status changes.
Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on May 5, 1970, by the Subcommittee on Parks and Recreation.
- S. 26 proposes a revision to the existing boundaries of Canyonlands National Park in Utah.
- S. 27 proposes the formal establishment of the Glen Canyon National Recreational Area.
- The proposed Glen Canyon National Recreational Area spans territory in both Arizona and Utah.
- The hearing was conducted during the Ninety-first Congress, second session.
Why It Matters
The hearing initiated the legislative process to define the official boundaries and management status of these major public land areas, directly impacting federal land administration and recreational access in Utah and Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Which states are affected by these proposals?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Federal Land Management
The hearing reflects a 1970-era legislative push to formalize and expand federal control over recreational lands in the American Southwest.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools