FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Due Process and Administrative Law Judges

Original title: EXAMINING DUE PROCESS IN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

January 1, 2016

administrative law due process Social Security Administration federal hiring disability claims Office of Personnel Management

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the efficiency and fairness of the federal disability claims process, which directly impacts the timeline and quality of decisions for citizens seeking Social Security benefits.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Disability claimants

The speed and fairness of their benefit determinations depend on the availability and independence of ALJs.

Administrative Law Judges

Their hiring process, independence, and workload are the primary subjects of the subcommittee's oversight.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This Senate subcommittee hearing examined the role, independence, and hiring process of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) within the federal government, specifically focusing on the Social Security Administration. The discussion addressed concerns regarding the agency's ability to hire enough judges to manage the growing backlog of disability claims.

Key Facts

The hearing was held on May 12, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are executive branch employees tasked with presiding over formal administrative adjudications.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for reviewing qualifications and hiring ALJs for the federal government.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) employs the largest number of federal ALJs.
Congress appropriated significant resources over the four years preceding 2016 to help the SSA hire more ALJs.
The SSA has faced challenges in hiring a sufficient number of ALJs to address the backlog of disability claims despite increased funding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an Administrative Law Judge?

An ALJ is an executive branch employee who presides over formal administrative hearings to ensure due process in government decision-making.

Why is the Social Security Administration mentioned so frequently?

The SSA employs the largest number of federal ALJs and is currently struggling with a significant backlog of disability claims.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the efficiency and fairness of the federal disability claims process, which directly impacts the timeline and quality of decisions for citizens seeking Social Security benefits.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Hiring Bottleneck

Despite increased congressional funding, the SSA was unable to convert those resources into a sufficient increase in ALJ staffing.

Social Security Administration Office of Personnel Management

Connected Entities

organizationSocial Security Administration“Primary agency discussed regarding disability claim backlogs”Map →

personTheresa Gruber“Deputy Commissioner, Social Security Administration”Map →

personHeidi Heitkamp“Subcommittee member”Map →

personMarilyn Zahm“Administrative Law Judge and President of the Association of Administrative Law ”Map →

organizationOffice of Personnel Management“Responsible for hiring and qualifying Administrative Law Judges”Map →

personJames Lankford“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management”Map →

personJoseph Kennedy“Associate Director, Office of Personnel Management”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance65
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy30
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment10
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz15
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools