Hearing on Executive Power in Foreign Affairs
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing examines the legal boundaries of presidential authority in foreign affairs, which impacts how the U.S. enters international agreements and manages federal spending on foreign policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Executive Branch
The hearing evaluates the scope of the President's constitutional authority in foreign policy.
Congress
The committee is assessing its own legislative and oversight powers relative to the President.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 12, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The session was convened by the Executive Overreach Task Force of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- The primary subject was the constitutional limits of executive power in foreign affairs.
- The hearing included testimony from three legal and policy experts: Eugene Kontorovich, Stephen I. Vladeck, and Steven Groves.
- The record includes opening statements from Representatives Steve King, Steve Cohen, Bob Goodlatte, and John Conyers, Jr.
- The document serves as the official record (Serial No. 114-75) for the 114th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing examines the legal boundaries of presidential authority in foreign affairs, which impacts how the U.S. enters international agreements and manages federal spending on foreign policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Executive-Legislative Balance
The hearing highlights a specific 2016 legislative effort to reassert congressional oversight over foreign policy actions taken by the executive branch.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance50How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools