Part ofState Department →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Senate Hearing on State Department Reauthorization and Oversight

Original title: STATE DEPARTMENT REAUTHORIZATION: AN OPPORTUNITY TO STRENGTHEN AND STREAMLINE U.S. DIPLOMACY

January 1, 2018

State Department Foreign Policy United Nations Peacekeeping Government Oversight Classified Information

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the legislative agenda for the 2017 State Department budget and policy authorizations, which dictate how the U.S. funds diplomatic operations and manages its financial contributions to U.N. peacekeeping missions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Foreign Service Officers

The committee is reviewing the pay and incentive structures for officers assigned to difficult overseas posts.

U.N. Peacekeeping Personnel

Proposed changes to accountability mechanisms, such as onsite court-martials, would directly impact how these personnel are disciplined.

U.S. Taxpayers

The committee is reviewing the U.S. contribution level to the U.N. peacekeeping budget, which currently accounts for nearly 30% of the total.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations held a hearing to discuss the 2017 State Department process, focusing on operational efficiency, U.N. peacekeeping accountability, and internal security protocols. The committee reviewed strategies for improving diplomatic operations and addressed concerns regarding the handling of classified information within the State Department.

Key Facts

The U.S. currently pays nearly 30% of the total U.N. peacekeeping budget.
The Committee aims to pass a bipartisan State Department reauthorization bill for fiscal year 2017.
The Committee is investigating reports of sexual exploitation and abuse by U.N. peacekeepers.
Chairman Corker proposed requiring onsite court-martials and standing claims commissions for U.N. peacekeeping operations.
The Committee is reviewing the U.N. peacekeeping assessment formula to address concerns over 'bogus discounts' for certain member nations.
The Committee is investigating systemic issues regarding the handling and safeguarding of classified information at the State Department.
The Committee is evaluating current incentive structures for Foreign Service Officers serving at difficult or 'less desirable' posts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?

The hearing is part of the process to reauthorize the State Department for fiscal year 2017, allowing Congress to update authorities and provide oversight on department operations.

What concerns were raised about U.N. peacekeepers?

Senators expressed concern over reports of sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers and the lack of accountability mechanisms to prosecute these individuals.

What is the status of the State Department's handling of classified information?

The Committee noted concerns regarding systemic issues with the improper handling of classified information and indicated a need for better training and accountability systems.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Focus on U.N. Accountability

The committee is moving toward conditioning U.S. financial support for U.N. peacekeeping on the implementation of specific judicial mechanisms like onsite court-martials.

United Nations Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

Connected Entities

personBob Corker“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations”Map →

personHeather Higginbottom“Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources”Map →

organizationUnited Nations“Subject of peacekeeping budget and accountability discussions”Map →

organizationSenate Committee on Foreign Relations“Congressional committee overseeing the State Department”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance75
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy40
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment15
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools