POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House Subcommittee Hearing on 2017 Defense IT and Cyber Programs

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 114-117] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities held a hearing to review the Department of Defense's fiscal year 2017 budget request for information technology and cyber programs. The discussion focused on balancing technological innovation with management discipline, the use of commercial business tools, and the development of for cyber operations.

Why it matters

This hearing sets the oversight framework for how the Department of Defense allocates funding for cyber defense and IT infrastructure in the 2017 fiscal year, impacting the security and modernization of military networks.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Department of Defense

The agency must align its IT and cyber budget requests with the oversight requirements and management standards discussed by the subcommittee.

Indirectly affected

Defense IT Contractors

The emphasis on public-private partnerships and the adoption of commercial tools may influence future procurement opportunities.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 22, 2016, to review the fiscal year 2017 budget request for IT and cyber programs.
  • The subcommittee emphasized the need for increased innovation through public-private partnerships.
  • The Chairman highlighted the necessity of using commercial business analytics and cloud computing tools within the Department of Defense.
  • The hearing addressed the challenge of maintaining human capital for the acquisition and management of IT and cyber systems.
Show all 6 facts
  • The Department of Defense is tasked with balancing increased innovation with management discipline to maximize the use of defense dollars.
  • Witnesses included the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer and the Deputy Chief Management Officer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
To review the Department of Defense's budget request for IT and cyber programs for the 2017 fiscal year and discuss strategies for secure warfighting networks.
Who testified at the hearing?
The Honorable Terry Halvorsen, Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Honorable Peter Levine, Deputy of the Department of Defense.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Emphasis on Commercial Integration

The hearing highlights a clear policy shift toward integrating commercial business intelligence and cloud computing tools into military IT infrastructure.

Connected Entities

Department of Defense, Ashton Carter, James R. Langevin and 3 more
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“The federal department subject to the oversight hearing”Map →
PersonAshton Carter“Secretary of Defense”Map →
PersonJames R. Langevin“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonJoe Wilson“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities”Map →
PersonPeter Levine“Deputy Chief Management Officer, Department of Defense”Map →
PersonTerry Halvorsen“Chief Information Officer, Department of Defense”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record