POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Rhode Island law requires off-duty police and firefighters to prove emergency existed for injury benefits

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- RELIEF OF INJURED AND DECEASED FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS (Requires that before any fire fighter or police officer is eligible to receive benefits for illness or injury sustained off duty, they prove they had reasonable grounds to believe that an emergency existed that required immediate need of their assistance.)

Last action · June 10, 2026: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Pete Appollonio and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Rhode Island enacts a requirement that off-duty police officers and firefighters must prove they had reasonable grounds to believe an emergency required their immediate assistance before qualifying for injury or illness benefits.

Why it matters

Changes eligibility standards for municipal safety personnel seeking compensation for off-duty incidents by adding a specific evidentiary burden of proof.

Background
  • S 2326 modifies existing provisions under Rhode Island law relating to towns, cities, and the relief of injured or deceased firefighters and police officers. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Fire fighters

Must satisfy a new evidentiary requirement regarding emergency involvement to qualify for off-duty injury or illness benefits.

Directly affected

Police officers

Must satisfy a new evidentiary requirement regarding emergency involvement to qualify for off-duty injury or illness benefits.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who does this new requirement apply to?
It applies to municipal fire fighters and police officers seeking benefits for illnesses or injuries sustained while off duty.
What must an off-duty officer prove to qualify for benefits?
They must prove they had reasonable grounds to believe that an emergency existed requiring their immediate assistance.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Jun 10, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor
  2. Jun 4, 2026
    Transmitted to Governor
  3. Jun 4, 2026Floor
    House passed in concurrence
  4. Jun 2, 2026
    Placed on the House Consent Calendar (06/04/2026)
  5. May 26, 2026Floor
    Senate read and passed
  6. May 22, 2026
    Placed on Senate Calendar (05/26/2026)
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. May 6, 2026Floor
    Committee recommends passage
  2. May 1, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration (05/06/2026)
  3. Apr 8, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  4. Apr 3, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/08/2026)
  5. Jan 23, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to Senate Labor and Gaming

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Raptakis, Ciccone, Matt LaMountain and 7 more
PersonRaptakis“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonCiccone“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonMatt LaMountain“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonBrian Thompson“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonBob Britto“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonTodd Patalano“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonLori Urso“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonJohn Burke“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonDavid Tikoian“Cosponsor of S 2326”Map →
PersonPete Appollonio“Primary sponsor of S 2326”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record