POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas Bill Establishes State Regulation, County Veto, and Decommissioning Rules for Industrial Wind, Solar, and Battery Facilities

Original title: AN ACT concerning energy; relating to certain electric generation and energy storage facilities; establishing requirements for the development, construction, modification, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of industrial wind and solar energy conversion systems and industrial battery energy storage systems; authorizing the board of county commissioners of a county to permit or deny the construction of such industrial energy facilities; establishing a protest petition and election process to contest such county action; providing jurisdiction to the state corporation commission to control and permit the development, construction, modification, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of such facilities; requiring the commission to approve and issue a permit prior to the new construction or expansion of any such facility; requiring owners of existing industrial energy facilities to register with the commission; establishing minimum setback distances for such facilities; requiring the commission to adopt a code of conduct and agricultural mitigation protocols; requiring a facility owner to establish and maintain a decommission plan and provide adequate financial assurance for the decommissioning; authorizing the commission to issue certain orders and impose civil penalties for violations; authorizing the commission to adopt rules and regulations.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

AN ACT concerning energy; relating to certain electric generation and energy storage facilities; establishing requirements for the development, construction, modification, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of industrial wind and solar energy conversion systems and industrial battery energy storage systems; authorizing the board of county commissioners of a county to permit or deny the construction of such industrial energy facilities; establishing a protest petition and election process to contest such county action; providing jurisdiction to the state corporation commission to control and permit the development, construction, modification, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of such facilities; requiring the commission to approve and issue a permit prior to the new construction or expansion of any such facility; requiring owners of existing industrial energy facilities to register with the commission; establishing minimum setback distances for such facilities; requiring the commission to adopt a code of conduct and agricultural mitigation protocols; requiring a facility owner to establish and maintain a decommission plan and provide adequate financial assurance for the decommissioning; authorizing the commission to issue certain orders and impose civil penalties for violations; authorizing the commission to adopt rules and regulations.

Why it matters

The measure shifts oversight of large-scale renewable energy projects by granting local voters county-level veto power and imposing statewide mandatory setbacks, registration fees, and civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation for facility owners.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Industrial energy facility owners

Must obtain state permits, register existing sites, adhere to strict setback rules and agricultural protocols, maintain financial assurance for decommissioning, and face potential civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation.

Directly affected

Board of county commissioners

Authorized to permit or deny the construction of industrial energy facilities by resolution and subject county decisions to local petition and referendum elections.

Directly affected

Qualified electors of Kansas counties

Empowered to file protest petitions and vote in countywide elections to permit or ban industrial energy facilities.

Directly affected

Landowners adjacent to industrial energy facilities

Protected by mandatory minimum setback distances from property boundaries, nonparticipating parcels, and dwellings, and entitled to compensation for land and agricultural damages.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can county voters block an industrial wind or solar farm from being built?
Yes. Beginning July 1, 2026, county commissioners can vote on permits, and a petition signed by 5% of qualified electors can trigger a countywide election. If a majority votes against the facility, it cannot be constructed.
What happens when an industrial energy facility stops producing electricity?
The facility owner is responsible for full or partial decommissioning within one year of operations ceasing. This includes removing all equipment, foundations, and fencing, and restoring the land to its prior useful condition.
What are the minimum distance requirements between wind turbines and neighboring homes?
Wind turbines must be located at least 4.0 times the maximum blade tip height away from the outside wall of any habitable dwelling, church, school, or medical facility, and 5,280 feet from state parks, lakes, and wildlife refuges.
Are existing wind and solar facilities required to get a state permit?
Facilities constructed or authorized by a county board prior to July 1, 2026, do not need an initial permit, but they must register with the by December 31, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Withdrawn from Senate Committee on Utilities; Rereferred to Senate Committee on Utilities
  3. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Withdrawn from Senate Committee on Ways and Means; Referred to Senate Committee on Ways and Means
  4. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Tuesday, February 3, 2026, 1:30 PM — Room 548-S — CANCELED
  5. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Utilities
  6. Jan 28, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Centralization of Renewable Energy Oversight

The bill shifts significant regulatory authority from purely local zoning to a dual structure combining state-level State Corporation Commission oversight with local county veto and election mechanisms.

Connected Entities

Secretary of State, State Corporation Commission, Kansas Department of Agriculture and 4 more
OrganizationSecretary of State“Publishes county election results regarding industrial energy facilities in the ”Map →
OrganizationState Corporation Commission“State regulatory body granted full jurisdiction to supervise, permit, and penali”Map →
OrganizationKansas Department of Agriculture“Consulted with the commission to establish agricultural impact mitigation protoc”Map →
OrganizationState Treasurer“Receives permit fees, registration fees, and penalties for deposit into the publ”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Utilities“Legislative committee that sponsored SB 417.”Map →
OrganizationNatural Resources Conservation Service“Source of scientific standards for agricultural impact mitigation work.”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency“Source of scientific standards for agricultural impact mitigation work.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record