POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Proposed Rules to Restrict Social Media for Children and Schools

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6266

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This amendment proposes two new federal policies: one banning social media accounts for children under 13 and restricting personalized content recommendations for teens, and another requiring schools to block social media access to remain eligible for federal broadband subsidies.

Why it matters

If enacted, this amendment would force social media companies to terminate accounts for users under 13 and require K-12 schools to implement strict internet filtering policies or risk losing federal E-Rate broadband discounts.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Social media platforms

These entities must implement age-gating, terminate accounts for users under 13, and disable personalized recommendation systems for minors.

Directly affected

K-12 schools

Schools must implement and certify social media blocking policies on their networks to maintain eligibility for federal broadband subsidies.

Directly affected

Children and teens

Users under 13 will be prohibited from maintaining accounts, and users under 17 will be subject to non-personalized content feeds.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this law require schools to track every website a student visits?
No. The bill explicitly states that schools are not required to track individual browsing history or search terms, only to ensure that social media platforms are blocked by a .
Can teachers still use social media for classroom instruction?
Yes. The bill includes a rule of construction stating that nothing in the act prohibits a teacher from using a social media platform for educational instruction.
What happens if a school cannot immediately afford the technology to block social media?
Schools can certify they are undertaking necessary procurement actions during the first two years after enactment to avoid losing funding, and may seek a waiver if local procurement rules cause delays.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of CIPA

The amendment significantly expands the scope of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) by specifically targeting social media platforms, which were not explicitly defined in the original 2000 legislation.

Connected Entities

Mr. Schatz, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission
PersonMr. Schatz“Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Agency responsible for school broadband subsidy oversight and enforcement.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Trade Commission“Primary enforcement agency for the proposed social media restrictions.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record