Code Compliance Hearings

>> Morning will go next. Our code Compliance special magistrate hearing Saturdays Day is 7/16/2026 first case on the docket. You see Sarasota versus William Laura. Maria Theresa Shed with Shaler. Laura. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 4, 0, For the record when is present with us. And as you know, sir, high we start with the starting this Kennedy this morning and I'll come right back it's as can whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this continue case that we have for violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 for an interior renovation that was done without a permit. We do have a permit that was issued back in March and then the final inspection took place on June, the 18th. So the property is currently in compliance. >> We'll find 105, 0.1 was correct on June 18 26. Fix the issue, fines and costs. And know it's going to get any questions, Mr. Lower. >> I don't think so. I don't think so. We do have a final affidavit prepare that reflects a potential civil fine of $33,000. Then 8 inspections at 800 sorry, $765. The city is not asking for all of that. 33,000 really asking for a one-day find of $100 and then the city to recoup its costs of $765. So the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden. >> All right. So you understand committee's recommendation? >> I believe says in its recommending up one day find $100 cost 76. 65 for the process. Got okay. North reasonable to me as well. Salt. Go with that. All opposed to a $500 and 7.65 and cost idea bacon on this and know you Let's go close out, Thank you. Thank you very much. Like your thing miss or visits take care. I will go on record for a city of Sarasota verse Apg Florida LLC is case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 5, 2, >> For the record was here on behalf of the >> City's position on this case. Well, this is to continue case that we have for violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 for an interior innovation without a permit. We do have an application that was made back in March of this year. We recently received a trans middle on June. The 24th. So they are it's waiting for review. So what they are making progress. But I was kind of hoping somebody would be here today to kind of give us some guidelines on how much longer mean if they're thinking, but with that would be comfortable pushing it out. Maybe 30 days. 45 days to give them an opportunity to get that permit issued. >> All right with that. So looking looking at. >> August, the 13th. At 11, 15. >> Into the case out August 13th 11:15AM, violation. 5, continue route. Last order. And that'll pick us off the record for number 2. I will go on record for City of Sarasota. First, Daniel, you Shetler builds a show words case number 2026, 0, 0, or 0, 1, for the record. Ruben Fishers, president representing them today, Mr. Official start with this candidate for the city. Come right back to so whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continue case that we have for violation of our city Zoning Code Section 6, 1, or 2 J one for recreational vehicle that was improperly stored on the property, which was correct it with our inspection on June. The 3rd, then we have one of 5.1 of the Florida building code for fence that was installed without a permit. Section 7.11, a one, a one for the fence being greater than 6 and a half feet in height. And then one of 5.1 of the Florida building code for electrical work that was done without a permit. We do have an application that was received back in March for the building permit. It was issued on June the 14th. So it looks like we just need a time line on how long Mr. Fisher thinks it's going to be to complete the permit process. All right, sir, go ahead. The permit up yesterday, it gets approved an already for inspection. >> OK, on. So son after the factor. Yeah. You need to call in the inspections. yeah. In fact, I was I. They needed one more document which would have been the electrical support. Or I could hadn't had inspection yesterday. I was trying to do that before the meeting, but it didn't quite happen. So where? I got the permit, we're just we just need to get the inspection. Getting permit. Is that something else that's out there, too? I think it's all It's all online one. Yeah. >> And there's ready to go to inspection of your inspection away from being done. Is that yeah. Our 2, 2 inspections, OK? Now? think what I need is electric final. And then and then probably the fence. And then the building flannel. So it's. You don't take. little bit. I guess. All right. Kelly, what do you think? 30 days on the 30 days should do it. I'm thinking. Let's see have we have August the 13th, which is about 30 days. We have 11:30AM, in the morning. Does that work for you? >> 11, 30 On August, the 13th. >> All right. This will looking to the case out August 13th 11:30AM, find a violation of 6 wanted T J. One of the zoning code corrected on 6/3/2026 105 0.1. The advice of the fence from the Florida building code 7, 1, 11. 0, One of the zoning code and one of 5, one of the Florida building code are all continuing as opposed to work. And hopefully wrap this up on the 13. Yeah. Thank you, sir. Appreciate The cure. Thank you. Thank you. Well, the next the city of Sarasota versus versus Natural Comfort where Saint Armands LLC case number 2025, 0, 0, 2, 5, 9, For the record. Your name again, as well. shut. Well, she's been here before. You know, the process start with Miss Kennedy for the city and come right back to Thank you. county, whenever you're ready. Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is continue case that we have for violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1. >> For an interior renovation without a permit. This was hurricane related. And it looks like the permit was issued back in December and then they had wanted to kind of get through season before they finished up their renovations. And the final will start on July. The second so properties currently in compliance. >> Walsh of agreement that the violation was corrected July 2nd. find that 1, 0, 5, one was correct. On 7/2/2026. Thanks to the issue, fines and Miss Kennedy. The city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do. This was hurricane related and we've kind of been very gentle with all of the Saint Armands businesses because it's been a long journey for them. So we're just asking you to find a violation today finds cost normally go back to you. But you can't do that. And that recommendation. So. >> The recommendations for no final accept that. That's going to close out the case or Thanks for getting done pre you. >> I will give the Reds get on the record I run record for. >> City of Sarasota versus SK Heigl Pelosi formally one 71 1 year and we'll see case number 2026, here's your 3, 2, 3. Robert Lincoln is here in behalf some of the respondent. The respondent. All right, sir, and I'll start with this committee. Come right back. So county, whenever you're ready. Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continued case that we have for violation of our standard housing code. 1.6. >> For a dock that's in disrepair. It looks I received the phone call very late I think was late yesterday and I was unable to give him a call back. But apparently the pilings have been removed. But we just need to go out and verify that. So where maybe push it out a couple weeks a week and then close it out. If that works for Mister Lincoln. >> Yes, I got a call from my client or an e-mail from a client Tuesday morning saying that the contractor had finished pulling the pilings, but we missed contact back and forth. So my client did not get back to that code enforcement officer in time for him to go inspect before today. So if we continue it, I think the inspection will show compliance and we can close it. >> Weeks you think enough for 3 I mean, as long as you will need to go out and inspect because the work got done. Tuesday morning. Okay. >> So is it OK if Mr? Sweeney does Mr. Kim K need to contact, Mr. Sweeney to kind of it. he could, just the property is vacant. Okay. So I don't think there's a problem with that if you would just Mr. Kim K. >> Noah headed time in case Mr. Cake, it's a a call from a neighbor. Anything, OK? Perfect. You have his number. Do you have Mister King case number? So maybe flee. >> Pass that along to Mr. Sweeney. That would be great. So 2 weeks we're looking at July, the 30th that that works for you, Mr. Lincoln, it will work you. We will have to. She will have it all cleared and want write. Do you want first thing in the morning or Great 8.30? Okay. July 30th. >> continue out July 32,026 08:30AM, when the violation. 1.1 1.6 housing code continuing. We'll see you then. Thank you, sir. Appreciate Thank you. >> your name and are calling. >> Richard Ellis, Code Enforcement hearing. Richard Allen. >> Please stay on the line. ? ? >> I Kevin, how? It how this is a Richard all serving as magistrate the City of Sarasota. How are you doing this morning, sir? >> I'm doing good about 2 and well. Thank you. If you're ready, we'll go on record for your case, which is styled a city of Sarasota Vs. >> Foundation Park Phase 3 LLC is case number 2026, 0, 0, >> 4, 9, 9, >> And just equipment of the line here. And I'll be right back. But we can get and we get it. It was all quarterbacks and just could not. Okay, >> really going OK, Mr. How procedurally I we start with the City of Sarasota, Kennedy's in for the city this morning show outlined the city's position on the case and then I'll come back and get your position. Okay. Okay. All right. Very good artist Kennedy. Whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a new case today for a violation of our city code sections. 16 Dash 47 for the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. And then 16 dash. 49 see for overgrowth. The overgrowth was corrected with our inspection on July. The 15th, but the junk trash rubbish remains out of compliance. So I just be looking to Mister how to see what kind of time frame he needs to get that cleaned up. >> All right, Mr. Hallam go to now. Thank you. >> let me say this week started on and all we got significant portion of it done. We met the inspector out there and asked the inspector you know we to focus on. So he told us what was most important to concentrate on and that we did accomplish. >> There is obviously there's a lot of stuff has been accumulating for years and years and years out there anyway, so we finish clean it up and just got a slow. But I'm Chris, a lot of it And it's been a long I mean, if you can give us another 30 days to get all who get it all I'm just I'm I'm afraid just because I don't live there and have to put down their supervise. What's going on? You know, a week or 2 probably wouldn't be enough. But but biggest, 30 days of tension we will be working on. the meantime. >> All right. this county, has the city feel about a 30 day continuing? I think that's fine. Our dockets a pretty full anyway. So should be okay. >> Looking at August, the 13th at 11:30AM. that works for you, Mr. Howell. >> What the week is? always the Thursday, sir. That be just fine. Sure. August to 13, Yes, sir. All right. That's what I'll do. I'll continue to face out August 13th 11:30AM, find a violation. 16. 47 of the code continuing. >> I believe to a 60 49 CE see is corrected. There is I feel like 15. Well, find out. Find that. And so. >> All right. So well that Celtic off the record. So have a good day. Take care. Thank all right. Thank you so much. Thank you. >> I want to go next to City of Sarasota versus Arnold J with trusty, the Arnold J which will trust. UH, the 8/1/2020 to arrive. Yes, distrust the rim REI Ws was revoked. trust you ad 8/1/2022 case number 2025, 0, 0, 4, 4, 0, >> I'll go to you Ms. Kennedy was the stipulation continue with >> And therein he had a death in the family. we're willing to go out about 60 days to give him some time to work through that. So we're looking at September, the 17th. And where we're going to put it in at 9 o'clock. >> got to September 17th at 09:00AM for the violation. Continuing was confirmed last 2 or so. All right, that here. That case to move off the record. All right. We're gonna go on record for a city of serious adverse ruling college of Art and Design Incorporated case number 2026, 0, 0, 0, 9, 8, So for the record, your name, Please. Byron lunch. Byron or Virus. Byron with a V as in Viktor The the IR IR. yes, sir. Thank you, sir. >> If a Ringling College of procedurally, I think was I start with the Start with Miss Kennedy come right back to Summit County. Whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continue case that we have for violation of our city Zoning section 7, 303, E 3 for but for maintenance as well as 7, 3, a 6 C for planting maintenance maintenance of the plants and things there has been some progress, according to the inspector, there was some plantings that were done, but they don't meet co. They're very small. So I think there needs to be maybe an on-site just to discuss what the requirements you can see how small the tree is. They need to meet code so I just be looking to Mr. Lynch, to see if he he's willing to maybe have an on site are in yeah. The arborists to kind of get feel for what the code requires. >> That's something you will induce or you. All right. So our buses here. So can up time when before leave, just going win. We want to bring this case back. >> Maybe 30 days 30 days you want 45? >> We're 5.45? We got to get through opening of school. Yeah. Gotcha comes first. So we've got August. The 27th. that works for you, what time of day is better for you, Mr. Lynch, 9.15, and 9.15, is good. >> Well into the KSAT August 27 to 9.15. Find a violations continuous 7, 3, 3 of the zoning code. As well as 7, 3, a C and so see you then. Thank you. Thank you. >> she did. >> All right. We'll go next. The city of Sarasota versus Lambeau, USA, LLC. think this is flammable island cuisine. Case. Number 2026, 0, 0, 3, 8, 8, For the record. No one's here on behalf Respondent. So whats the city's position on this one. >> Well, this is to continue case that we have for violation of our city Zoning Code section 7, 107. For signs installed without a permit. It was a lull and a banner sign and then Section 7, 1, 10, 16 J for and a frame sign which is prohibited out on the circle. That remains in compliance as of our inspection on March, the first. So we just have that sign permit issue. We currently do not have any permit applications and this is our 4th hearing. So it's been ongoing for quite some time. So with that, we've prepared an updated affidavit. Mr. Spence off guard, by the way. >> And >> this is not against the property. The property owner. Okay. So the initial inspection was January, the 21st of 2026, the notice was mailed January. 26. The notice was served on January 31st by certified Mail compliance set for February. The 10th property is not current business is not currently in compliance. Civil fine began running on February 11 through July, the 14th. That's 154 days at $100 per day for $15,400 and then 6 inspections at $615. Cities asking that you enter this affidavit into evidence as exhibit number one and to impose the fines and costs >> I know that the affidavit to exhibit one base in the affidavit off and the violation of 7 to 107, continuing 7 went in 2016. Jays remain is was brought compliance on. On March. First on post a civil fine based on the affidavit, $15,400 to date 6.15, Acosta dates $100 per day daily and to a violation is corrected. On the Representatives required to attend the next hearing in what's available. >> We have August the 13th at 11. 45? >> You know, 13th 11:45AM. We are on record. I think I heard run for City of Sarasota vs. >> Jane, the and Regal Art Gallery for 8. >> Case number 2026, 0, 0, 1, 5, And for the record, sir, your name. I mean, Cone. first for me, H y and me. All right. Mister Cohen procedure that we start with the city of do with Ms Kennedy. And I'll come right back to you, OK, Mr. Kennedy, whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a new case today violation of our City Zoning Code section 7 Dash 107, 4 sign that was installed without a permit. We have an application that was submitted back on April. The first and we recently had a trans middle online July. The 12th. And I think it's still in review by our zoning division. So I just be looking at Mr. Cohen to see how that's going what kind of timeframe he's thinking for finishing the permit. >> I what what? What are you? What additional information we don't find allies of a minimum waiting, waiving them develop design firm this time. And they going have different, I don't Works, but I gave them a deposit. Then I have a few questions and then I don't know something that makes Then he gave me a deadline. I they before the deadline. He said that we have them. But I had a had journey speak him. But everything straight out now and we've got it. You don't company? Yes, it Your senses. yes, you're right. The they're prosecuting the weather should sounds like Kennedy's indicate they have lived there. >> says the nation's. So yes, what you're telling me is that sign paid for. And once the permit issue, they should just put it right. All right. Well, as give give that time, time to work itself out we're going 30 45 days, 30 days, you think can be enough time to get your sign permit issued in closed out. You think there's I have to do. The contractor should be doing it. Is that a contractor? So your contractor of drug that does it this week, you want do, is that your contractor make sure you get it done. >> You know, I'm sorry. But the reason I have to get attorney is. This guy started. Christen me on the phone. it's not really my style. I'm Well, you know, if he doesn't do it you know, maybe your attorney will step and maybe doesn't do I the only one that's again. They settle that in one out. And one fungal and the guys cursing me. Those. I don't understand what he say. You know I'm 71 of a little forgetful. It is what it All right. Well, as well just continue this out. All right. >> So how our next 8 for you to come back and hopefully it will be ready to close out August. The 13th. It's a Thursday. And this 11 45 work for you? But come back to do a comeback to close out the case. We have to wrap up the case once you're permits all done. So August, the 13th at 11. 45? >> That's me that so yeah, I just want look into the case out. 8/13/2026, 11:45AM. the violations 7, 1, 0, 7 is continuing at this point, Mr. Cohen I see today, thank you, guys. Thank Thank >> All right. With we're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Glencoe Properties Group Corp case number 2026, 0, 0, 4, 8, 4, >> In 2026 years. were 9 to the may be some resolution to this one. Some is candy with the city. position on these 2 cases. Yes, on these 2 cases, this property actually sold. >> So we're just looking to dismiss these 2 cases. And we've already started cases for the new owner. So just dismiss >> exposed to the sun, both of these cases and take us back off the record on those 2. We're going to go next. The city of Sarasota versus she would do alone is for us to the issue of loan. Trusted 12, 13, 2018 case. Number 2025. 0, 0, 1, 3, 3, for the record. She with Davis his present with us. And as you know, I would start with the Start with Miss Kennedy. come right back. This can whatever you're right. Thank you, Mr. Ellis >> this was a couple of violations for one of 5.1. And I think a permitted use violation. But the only thing that we have left is the overall permitting of the renovations that took place at the property. We did have a they have applied for a permit. We had a transmittal that was submitted on June, the 30th and it looks like it needs review for zoning and building corrections as well. So I just be looking to miss going to see how that process is working. >> can you offer here? Where are we in the application process? >> Would you mind telling me what is missing? >> It looks like there is a trans middle. Let's see he's going to pull it up for us. >> Because according to my general contracting, he has nothing has been posted since I think maybe. >> So, July the 6, this is from the building of the plans examiner and theirs. There's some comments that they need when might maybe maybe we can send This is this is not a FPA or in a way. I'm not sure what that means. be I have no idea. So might be a good idea if your contractor to give. Kevin Magnussen call and then also it says, please provide. Can you go up just? The other way? There's some other ones. There's some please provide certificates for the AC. So there's there's a couple different things that he's looking for. I can get this, I should be on the portal. I would think there was nothing on the Yeah, that they should be on the portal on. If you we can always send that to you. If you'd like e-mail. Appreciate it. Yes, after this. Just give me your e-mail on our email it to that's okay. And then zoning still has to review. So. >> I I just need to agree to when to bring this back. >> I think so. Yes. Another question is this with what's missing zoning? They're they're still reviewing it. So they have not finished their review. So once they review it, don't let you know if there's anything needed there. I had one question >> this affidavit that I was that I is that good? Because when I got everything taken care of and they told me and the record department that's already recorded. So I didn't need to send another letter. Are you want you guys want the letter? >> That might be something you need to ask permitting because it might be something they need for the permit. Zoning might need it. I don't know. Not Street second floor, right? What it you want to do is it just to me. It's it's on record. every everybody has need physically bring another one But I I I would stop over on the 3rd floor and ask for zoning in list to see if that's what they need because they might need that. All right. Let's be got time to bring it back. >> Let's go. 45 days. 6, you have to make the call. I will be here. Okay. vote the way the traveling. Okay. This. August, the 27th. That's a Thursday. As far as you know, it's okay right now. What time of day, according to your travels. >> So >> but afternoon, be better in the afternoon is but okay. Okay. We have a 3.15. If that works just to be sure. It's just calculate 6 hours ahead, 6 hours ahead. So you want something earlier than that? We're 6 hours ahead or where you're going, where I'm going 6 hours ahead. Okay. So you'll want something earlier. The nine-year like if you're like 9. It's gonna be 3. 9 o'clock. 15 year for your time or probably about 9 o'clock because 6 hours ahead is going to be might. yeah. The 3 o'clock your time. >> Okay. We continue out if we have that time available. Yes, at 09:00AM. >> find that 1, 0, 5, 1, 1, many well were corrected. remaining once it's January. So >> this global call you and hopefully you can. Every country to work through process. You're a little bit. >> You know, we're just so I think city is going to send you a copy of this. So that will help you communicate with your on track. Let's give. Thank you. >> Record for city of Sarasota for 6 or else. Each case. Number 2026, 0, 0, 8, For the record, please. Jennifer, earlier, yep. Ryan, as you know, I would start with the Start with Miss Kennedy and come right back. So this can be whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continued case that we have 4, 16 Dash, 47 of our city code for the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. I think the first hearing we did like a 60 day monitor period and had fallen back out of compliance and then it looks like there's not been any change. We have more stuff by the curb and there some tree debris and things there. So I just be looking to the to see, you know what, what kind of timeframe we're going to need to clean this up and bring it back into compliance and keeping compliance. >> I mean, happens to be that you guys go exactly when this is happening. I just passed by this morning and it's cleared when they put book stuff out there. I immediately called the book pick-up. We're not on site. So I'm coming like 3 times a week and maintenance is there Tuesdays and Thursdays. So this morning they cleared out everything, OK, when it's like book stuff. I called the City. I mean, right? It's just unfortunate that the inspector there. We just had move out on the 14 an I mean, I have proof of all of in my system. Some like, okay. You know, they there were probably the ones that put that furniture out there. >> So will probably need one more inspection to verify compliance. Let me see you out. Yeah. We see what we have. I hate to keep bringing it back. But we have next week, July the TWENTY-THIRD or we have July 30th available. Whatever is going to work for you. July 30th works. Okay. then we have an 8.45. We have a 10. >> If what if I work a 45? Okay. >> the case July 32,020 16. 45 am my Not like it's already place. thank you. >> No problem there. >> Thank you, sir. ? ? ? >> Your call has been forwarded to an automatic voice message system. Sorry, the mailbox belonging to 2, 3, 9, 6, 9, 2, 7, 4, 8 time it's fall and will not receive your message. Please hang up. Are you still there? >> All We a Jeffrey minutes scheduled to Pierre by telephone today. Unfortunately, he did not take the call and there's no voice mail ability. I others on his phone. So we will go on record for next 2 cases, city of Sarasota verse Rcp Lending Fund the First LLC case. Number 2024, 0, 0, 92. 2025, 0, 0, 9, 8, 5, And so what the city's position on these 2 cases. >> Okay. I'll take them separately the first case 2024. 0, 0, 9, 8, 2, is violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 for an interior demo without a permit the permit was issued back in April and we have not had any We have had some sun inspections. It looks like they had a couple on or just one on the 8th. So he is working through the process on that one. So I think we're good just to push that went out with the rest, going pushed out. So the second case, 2025, 0, 0, 9, 8, 5, As for violation of city Zoning Code section 7 Dash 3.27, for a dead or damaged tree. I spoke with the arborist and she states that the trees are growing back and they're growing into a neighbor's yard which cause some damage last time from the hurricanes and the neighbors had to clean it up. So we were really hoping that Mr. Menace would be here today are up here by telephone. So we could get a timeline for the removal. With that. Our last hearing, June 11th, you started $100 daily running fine. Today. We're asking you to increase that to be running fine to 2.50, to get some movement so he take the tree out. >> All Modify prior order, increase the daily run the to 50 per day. And that's case. Number 0, 9, 8, 5, Both the most find violations continue 1, 0, 5, 1, of the first case. 92 and it's 07:00AM sorry. 7, 3 to 7 is Oneco does continue in the second case and 9, 8, 5, Second case of increasing daily running to 50 per day on the caterer representatives required to attend the next hearings in both cases and what term? Available time. We have August the 13th at 1 o'clock. >> All right. We'll continue out to both cases out to August. The 13th. 01:00PM. All right. We'll go next to City of Sarasota personally and Leonardo da Jala. It's a case number 2026 0, 0, 2, 5, 9. And sir, you we in young. Very good, sir. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Mr. Yaalon, I will start with the city would Miss Kennedy for the city and chill. Explain the city's position and then I'll come right back to you. >> want to go. Intricacy got and got we had about a 10 0 But I alright, Ms Kennedy, whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continue case that we have for violation of our city Code. Section 16 Dash 47 for the Cumulus Jean of junk rubbish and trash 307, 0.4 of a standard housing code for care premises. One of 5.1 of the Florida building code for interior and exterior renovations without a permit. We do have a permit that was applied for back in January and it looks like we had a trans middle on July, the 13th. So it looks like we're slowly moving forward. So just be looking to Mr. Yaalon to see what kind of time frame he needs to get the permit issued in close out. Okay, ballot. You summarize it. >> So and causes. But a investor deck at for the like us eat them put lows. enormous Yanis KCNA not enter the and s top down on the Comeaux my Scott. The misses the bus. >> Westwood out of Florida, then we'll be able come in and that the met Monday. They'll not about that then thing. But that meant that okay. It don't. They don't comment that last medical cannabis place be. Getty. I have an outlet pass and goes this not down for minute, but I want points and that if honest, I'm in a semi and I'm just living in it. you fail. But that meant that is that. I'm this place. But adult is and me so but a van. I own. But, just allow scent. That an election we'll see in that. Is that you that that is do that. then that pasta Hamas, Sam Alito past set. That that that meant to me and no, no, I of the out. So that meant is implement this Will Wilma? But it is. For a mission that is. And so I stopped for a mother says make it on off. Well, I get good to and families? >> Okay. the artist clean here, the video of it and he did say that the inspector can meet with him after today's hearing too confirmed that the artist clean. He is waiting for his permit to finish the renovations. He hasn't given time frame. He's just that he's waiting for the permanent. Cities that want >> So everything that is received, the application and considering the permit at this point and that, yes, we did get a trance middle on the 13th. It looks like. So it looks like it's pending the building. The plan's examiners review. It was approved by zoning. So yes, it looks like we probably just gonna need some more time to finish out the permit process so we can get that message cities he has. He's submitted what so far. Yes, so I guess we just need to talk about far out. We should push right. >> Let's go. 45 days to give him an opportunity to get that permit issued. We're looking at August the 27th at 10 o'clock. If that works for Mr. Yeah. So they want to going to single but a understanding the info that look at ISIS. But but me so. >> even us I'm sorry. What August 27th at 10. But on NBC at goes as the as monument as so start investing. >> 700 modest. 27 10:00AM. so yes, but her, but they're like that. think the that have goes It's been as the And it's OK. All right. Talking to the case out 8/27/2026 >> find violations. Continuing is cited. >> And until confirmed otherwise and so Mr. Yaalon, we'll see you then. Thank you. Thank you. thank you thank you. ? >> Okay, we're on company. That's right now take your time. I Jennifer, Hershey. >> Yes, the fishing for >> if you're ready, what will go on record for your 2 cases which are style, city of Sarasota versus Jennifer S Hershey. We have case number 20 2024, 0, 0, 1, 6, 6, and 2024, 0, 2, 1, 6, 8, as you know, we start with the city Ms Kennedy's in for the city today in show outlined the city's position on these 2 cases. And then I'll come right back to you, OK? All right. This county, whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, these are continue cases today. >> violation of the standard unsafe building abatement Code for 3. A 1.4 for repair, demolish the structures. They were in bad shape of course, she has chosen to repair them. We do have a permit applied for it. Looks like on the first one on 9.74, which was 2024. 0, 0, 1, 6, 6, It looks like it's It's pending in O C. So it's the the permits been picked up. So it's pending notice of commencement. So that is a good deal. The second one, 2025, 0, 0, 9, 8, 5, Looks like. That one has been issued the plan approved. It looks like. So. Fees are due. So we're looking for some sort of fees and things. So maybe the payment for the permit is due and then your can pick up the permit. So looks like we're moving forward. miss her sing. >> Yes, believe all term, proved at this point and start paying online. I think I paid want to have more to pay. I was doing that this morning and I believe my contractor operating will the tree permanent and essentially cut down the old tree. The fencing barriers for that trees and a one you did. And I think started dating. think everything is moving just trying to get logistics. process Canada. I didn't hear That one permit that I sure it was approved or not with it 4, 9, 6, 4, was or wasn't approved. 9, 6, 6, looks like it's just been approved yesterday. It looked like they were. >> Some other comments about impact fees or something. But today it looks like it's ready for issue just need to pay for the permit. Pick it up. Very good. Alright. So we just probably need to continue 2 cases out to. >> Some. Yes, I'm gonna go out 60 days to give Mister Xi some time to. Repair under way. And we're looking at September, the 17th and how about 10, 30 mister. She does that work. >> I thank you sure. >> All right. That's all continue both cases out to September, 17th at 10, 30 by the violations or continue in both cases decided at this point. And hopefully it can be retrieved and work can be done as expeditiously. So we will see you then Mr. okay. You. Thank you. Bye Bye. Bye. >> I will go next to City of Sarasota. First Executive Strategies Incorporated case number 2026, 0, 0, >> 509. And for the record. No one is present on behalf of the respondents. So what city's position on this case? >> this is to continue case that we have for violation of our city code. I'm sorry, City Zoning Code Section 7, 9, g for a feather flag. Which those are prohibited. But throughout the city, I am pleased to report that the violation was corrected with our inspection on July. The 15th. >> All right, now for the violation was corrected on July 2006, thanks to the issue, fines and costs and cities. A recommendation on that is yes, we I think this was her tenants. So we're just asking you to vacate prior order and find a cost just to find a violation. >> I do have a big hit the prior order. And not impose any fine or any cost. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Nancy Jacobs that out case number 2000, 25, 0, 1, 4, 3, 7, And for the record, are you Nancy Jenkins? Cheryl Rivers and and you're here with your connection to Nancy Jenkins this month. seems do can understand you guys enough issue this properties that that was yes, sir. Okay. All right to Miss Rivers, I'll start with the city and come right back to a that Kennedy for the city's in this county. Whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continued case that we have for violation of city Code. Section 16 Dash 47 for the humiliation of junk rubbish and trash. And I'm pleased report that violation was corrected with our inspection on July. The second and then we have 16 dash. 49 be for overgrowth and it's that complied are still. So what's the date for that one yesterday? So I am police report. The violation was corrected with our inspection of July. The 15th and then we have 3 of 3005.1 of the standard housing code for Roof in disrepair that was corrected with our inspection on July, the 9th. So the property is currently in compliance with rivers. eye that sees indicating property been brought comply. But one man, Mister Kennedy agree with that. >> Okay. Then I will for the record fund 16. 47 was corrected. The city goes corrected July second, 2020, 60. 49 be the city code. >> Corrected 7/15/2026 Thrill. 5.3 point want to stand housing code was correct. On 7/9/2026 takes us to the issue of fines and costs Kennedy's city have a recognition on that issue. >> We do your honor. We do have a final affidavit care that reflects a potential civil fine of $42,650. 7 inspections at $690. The city is not asking for all of that civil fine. We're only asking for one day find of $100 and the city to recoup its costs of 6.90, for the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden for the process. >> Okay. Mistakes. You understand committee's recommendation to me, potential fine was 42,000 is recommending a one-day $500 in cost of 6.90, for the process of the taxpayer doesn't pay for this process. Sounds reasonable to me. So I'll go with that. Has 101 day, $500 cost of 6.90. I think we And if make public and how they get the prior or the established a big find in the Thank you for coming today. Thank you for taking taking control this. OK? Thank you. Thanks, Some kind of car. Somebody may be spying on your card. Goodness. We'll go next to a city of Sarasota versus to Moss. Pablo Morales doing business is tech Corey a lot much of case. Number 2026, 0, 0, 7, 6, 6, for the record spotted not present here today. But this. Must be maybe a resolution to this. >> There is this is a continue case that we have for violation of city Code. Section 19 DASH for operating a business without a local business tax receipt. I am pleased to report that the violation was corrected with our inspection on June, the 22nd. So the property, the business is currently in compliance. >> All right. I'll find the 19 Dash. 3, 8, was corrected. June 22nd recommendation on fines and costs. They brought into compliance. So we're good. We're just asking you to vacate. >> Pre-order no finds no cost. I that's I'll do. All they could prior order imposed. No fine, no cost. >> I will go next to city of Sarasota versus Stephen C I'm sorry, Stephen S Leveson case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, For the record. The respondent not president, but there may be. Some resolution to this or >> there is this is a continue case. I think this is the 3rd or 4th hearing Mr. Staying Christopher same was counsel for Mr. Leveson this was related to an accessory dwelling unit that was constructed without a permit. And then for permitted use for having 2 dwellings and a single-family residence we had said I think zoning had stated that if they received a letter and a floor plan particular. I think we put it on record last time that we would dismiss this case. The city's agreed with that. So we had we received the letter on 7.14. So we're dismissing the case. >> You think of a kid on the dismissed the case, that's Thank you. We're going record for city of Sarasota versus Charles Dwatney to your headset case number 2026, 0, 0, 3, 0, 6 2026. She was a 307. And for the record. The respondent is not present today. And these 2 cases. So the city's position. >> These are continue cases that we have the first one, 2026, 0, 0, 3, 0, 6, As violation of city Code Section 16. 47 for the accumulation of Joe jumped provision. Trash 16 dash. 29 see for overgrowth. Both those remain out of compliance. The second one, 2026, 0, 0, 3, 0, 7, is for the violation of city code. 16 Dash. 47, the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. 16 dash. 29. See for overgrowth. And then section 7, 3, 13 of our city zoning code for trees overhanging the sidewalk or right away at a low height. All of these violations are out of compliance. We've had no shows at all of the hearings and we're currently running at $250 per day. So the city's requesting that we Continued out one more time and then the next. And we'll just get the authority to correct. Okay. >> All right. So pick a new date here against them. And we've August, the 13th. >> We've got 1 o'clock. both KSAT August 13th at one of 01:00PM. I'll confirm violations. >> Continue Both cases is cited. Does confirm my prior orders which really defines running and on the K to 12 is required to attend for whatever that's worth. Thank you for record. >> Telephone number 941-350-8143, can take your call now. At the town. Please report your message when you finished recording simply hang up or press pound for further option. >> Davis with this is Richard. Also ahead, you scheduled for code enforcement hearing to appear on the Martha Nichols case. Unfortunately, getting voicemail saw. I'll probably just proceed with the hearing. You may want to contact code enforcement to find out the result. Thank you. All right. The city of Sarasota versus Nichols case. There are 2026 0, 0, 1, 7, 0, And for the record responded, not presence. So what's responders behalf so its position on this? >> Well, this is to continue case today for a violation of our city Code Section 16 Dash 47 for the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. That violation remains out of compliance. As you can see from our photos. with that, I was hoping that Mister Davis would appear at least by telephone to give us an idea of when they plan to clean up the property since we've gotten no response past couple of times, we do have an updated affidavit. That reflects an initial inspection of November. The 12th of 2025, the notice was mailed November 19th a notice to serve December 15th by posting compliance is set for December. 20th. The property is not currently in compliance. The civil fine began running on December. The 21st through July, the 14th, that's 206 days at $100 per day for $20,600. And then 5 inspections at 5.40. The city is asking you to enter this affidavit and 2 into evidence of exhibit number one and to impose the fines and costs. they're in. >> admit the exhibit as exhibit one fund 60. 47. That's because continuing all oppose a civil fine to date of $20,600 Costa. They also impose a 5.40 yesterday, $100 per day dealing running fine until violation is corrected on to keep the Martha Nichols. Is required to attend the next hearing. And what we have. >> We August the 13th at one. 45? I happen to the case out August 13th. be at one 45 pm. >> I will go next. The city of Sarasota versus Rodrigo Michelle and Rosa. Michelle. Case number 2026, 0, 0, 0, 6, 6 for the record. No one's here on behalf of respondents. So cities position on this case. >> Yes, this is a continued case that we have 4 violation our city could section 16 Dash 47 for accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. 16 dash. 54 an inoperable unlicensed vehicle. violation was corrected with our inspection on June, the 10th and then section 7 to 14 be of our city zoning code. For a prohibited commercial vehicle. That was violation, was corrected with our inspection on July. The 15th. And then we have sections 7 to 14 E for a commercial trailer. That's not Bufford remains out of compliance. And in 3 a 7.4 for ever standard housing code for care premises, they're storing construction materials on the property which remains out of compliance. So we do have 2 violent, 3 violations that remain out of compliance back at the last hearing. No, I wasn't at the time before you increase the daily running fine to to 50 per day. And then we did have a little movement with the vehicle and then the commercial trailer or the commercial prohibited commercial vehicle. But we've had nothing sense. So we'd be willing to continue this one more time. And then if not, we'll just bring that fire the party. So we're looking August. The 13th. ? Available time is 02:00PM. >> Cal adopt the. The findings of the as that line moves. Kennedy of the violations. And I will just come to the KSAT August 13 to 02:00PM on the Cape that the respondents are required to attend the hearing. I will go next. Us city of serious adverse Marvin hinted Ph D case number 2026, 0, 0, 8, 8, 7, for the record. No, it's here on behalf of Marvin Ph D he's not present. So the city's position on this case. >> Well, this is a new case today for a violation of our city Code Section 19 Dash 2, a for renewed for doing the local business tax receipt for the business as well as the professional. I hate this business and professional. They are out of compliance at this time. And I was hoping the respondent would be here so we could talk about a timeline to get that issued. But with that, we do have an affidavit prepare that reflects an initial inspection of April 15th of 2026. The notice was mailed on April 15th. The notice was served on the 21st of April by Certified Mail. Compliance is set for April 24th, the business and the professional. They're not currently in compliance. Sorry. We had a blackout. And I was so good about getting it already. OK? And there we go in the civil fine began running on April, the 25th through July, the 10th. That's 77 days at $100 per day for $77,700, 3 inspections at $390. The city is asking that you enter affidavit into evidence as exhibit number one, the notices of hearing as exhibits 2, 3, and to impose the fines and costs shown their hand. >> On 1, 2, 3, find that there's a continuing violation of. to a a he said violations a way that they were corrected and October. No, no, it's sorry, 2 violations. 9, 2, dash, 2, 8, based on the affidavit all met around Jose 1, 2, 3, are admitted by did say that. And Allan Poe's of Civil fine of $7700 today cost today to 3, $1900. We'll $100 a day daily running. Find 2 violations corrected on the Cape. Marvin hinted Phd's required to attend. The next market Hinton. Is anyone and what her date? >> We have August the 13th at 2.15. >> All right. the case up to August, the 15th August, the 13th at 2.15 on. >> I wasn't here. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus 7.11, incorporated. It's case number 2025, 0, 1, one, a 2. And sir, your name again for the record. My first ones are like you. >> Alright servant. >> All right. You were here before. So I know, you know the procedure. I'll start with the Miss Kennedy for the city on the city's position today. come back to you, OK? So this can. And whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is the continued case that we have for violation of our city Zoning Code section 7, 3, 0, 4, 1, that which references the parking lot landscaping requirements and then also section 7, 60 for the maintenance standards of the buffer it does. We do have some correction dates, the maintenance standards, 3.60, was corrected with our inspection on February. The second and then the parking lot landscaping requirements. As you can see, there's lots of new plantings corrected with our inspection on July, the 11th. So the property is currently in compliance. >> Okay, sir. agree with Okay. I would thought you might be so often it's 7, 3, or 4, 1, of his own. was correct. In July, 11th 2000. 26 7 Three-sixty was created back February. Second, 2026. >> So it takes us to the issue of fines and costs candidates the city of a recommendation on that. >> We do. We do have a final affidavit for some final affidavit prepare that reflects a potential civil fine of 6 is at 16, $16,000. And then for inspections at 4.65. The city's not going to asking for any of this, Wolf. And we're asking for all of the city's costs at $465. So the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden for the Fun cost only forced see. get your response to that. Recommendations are. >> Because I just got the letter on the main just 2 days before I I'm not only the property, from Sony the levee. I understand that they know. And so aware of the situation right? It's >> So it's just this not asking all those. The 6th afternoon asking for nothing SOT and now it's asking for no final. Accept that note. No fine. Just cost for process of 4.65. The thing I'll tell you respond here. 7.11, incorporated says so. It's just so, you know, now go with that. And thank you, sir, for coming. Appreciate. Thank you. Have a good day to you. I really go next to City of Sarasota successor. Cessar LLC its case. Number 2026, 0, 0, 3, 1, 1, And I believe you're Charles Parmalee, correct? Yes, Mr. Parmalee procedure year before. So, you know, I'll start with Miss Kennedy for the city come right back to Summit County. Whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continue case that we have for a violation of our city cause Section 16 Dash 47 for the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. I am pleased to report the violation was corrected with our inspection on June, the 16th. So the property is currently in compliance. Now. >> All right, Mr. Partly to with Yes, okay. Very good. All right. find a violation. 60 47 was correct. In 6/16/2026, which again takes us to the issue, fines and cost the city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do. We have a first and final affidavit prepare that reflects a potential civil fine of $15,400. 5 inspections at 5.40. They were pretty good about responding. Pretty quick. We're not going to be asking for any of the civil fine, but all of the costs the 5.40. So the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden for the process. >> Alright, certainly get your response to that recommendation. That's fun. OKC, reasonable to me go with no fine and cost over the cost for what it would 40 I-40. And if nothing to make it on this All right. So we'll have a good day. Take you up on the violation was corrected. June 16th. Thank you. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus done Klinsmann. We have case number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 9, 2, in 2025, 0, 1, 1, 9, 6, and supplies meant here before. So, you know, start with Miss Kennedy. I'll come right back to Summit County. Whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. take these separately. 2025, 0, 0, 9, 9, 2, is for violation of our standard housing code. 3 of 5.1, 5 for a shed that's in disrepair. The permit was reinstated. So we just need that final inspection to close it out on the second case, 2025, 0, 1, 1, 9, 6, That was a violation of Florida building code. One of 5.1. For offense. that was installed without a permit. appears that the permit was reinstated as well. We just need that inspection for that fence. So we're looking for some final inspections. So I just be looking to Mr. Clutch want to see when we can expect it would get contractor called that I do. The contrary by you by owner. >> Yeah. So you need to do is calling your inspections. Yeah. Yeah. So and just continue to me. >> When June was so busy at my job, you're my days off. So I kind of behind where I want to military out there. But I've been. >> Get it squared away. So, yes, it's pretty much just the inspections. Just ask for. >> couple of weeks or so to okay. >> To do that. And I when we do it that way was push it out with 3 weeks, maybe to be insane for weeks. What what's good for you already 84 weeks? have it. We'll go 30 days. OK? Sounds good year. All right. With that. It gives me time. Yeah, makes sense. sure. So August the 13th, we have a Okay. All right. So continue both cases out to August 13th. At 2.30 and do. violations and we'll wrap it up then. Thank Good to see Thank Thank you. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus your Dano Orlando, condom Hernandez. And for the record. And sileo is here. And you can see those here on behalf of her client was present. Also so I'll start with the city and I'll come right back. Right back to MS can Sileo. We'll go from there. Summit County whenever you're ready. Thank you. This is a continue case we have for violation of the Florida building code. One of 5.1. >> For interior and exterior renovation. It looks like our permit was issued back in middle of May. We had a mechanical and rough. I had mechanical and plumbing. Rough past on the 16th are scheduled for the 16th. I'm sorry. So yeah, we've had something about a letter and letter on file and then we're waiting for that mechanical ref to come through too. So just be looking to miss can sileo Mr. Hernandez to see what their time frame is for finishing up the permit and also to make one comment. If the shed has been removed, will need to have an on site just to verify that. So. Okay, counseling you. >> Yeah. So working through inspections it's just seems like every time they come out there, something still working through. But I think as of today, we believe the past the RAAF and just need to schedule the final, correct? Yeah. great. 30 days, 30 days. You thing and what about the shed has a and remove longer moved. I think we talked about last his longtime. Yeah. >> Okay. So do you have Kayla contact information? I I do. You do. And she knows about She knows. I remove that. Okay. Did she come on site and take take a peek? She probably needs to do that. Just to verify that it and remove. So if you want to reach out to her, that would be wonderful, OK? So we have 30 days. Let's see where we're at. Have any time. I have August 13. I have 2.45. That's our last lot. Or we can go to the 20th. Yeah. Do we have to pass final in order for us to get this resolved? Yeah. Yeah. Final inspection. Yeah. They're the 20th and says that one 13 through the 20th. >> And to it. >> Okay. We don't want to ruin your birth. It not Not really present right numbers it. And that is that possible. We could do to let me see what we >> I'm going to call for final tomorrow's okay that we they can schedule it and >> we have August the 6th and we have an 11, 30 11. 1? I think that's the only that's only time slots we have on August. The 6th, which is the week before. >> We're live New The level you want to do what's the earliest 11, 30? >> to that August 6 at 11:30AM, fun of ocean continued. Good luck. Thank you again to give. Thanks. Thank you. All right. Well, we're going record for a city of Sarasota versus Ashley Stevens. We have case number 2026 0, 0, 0, 5, 2, And for the record, I believe you are actually Steve Kerr of kindness to the you've been here with us before. So, you know the we start with the start with this Kennedy today and then I'll come right back to you, OK, Kennedy, whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continued case that we have for a violation of our city Section 16. 47 for the accumulation of junk rubbish and trash that violation and police report was corrected with our inspection on July. The 15th, the properties looks nice and clean. One of 5.1 of the Florida building code for a fence that was installed without a permit. My understanding is that this event is working on it as she as she gets that ability financially and stuff and then 16 dash. 54 an inoperable unlicensed vehicle remains in compliance. As of our inspection. June tense. So really the only thing we're after is a fence permit right now. So just be looking to Miss Stevens to see what her timeline is or she has some sort of. >> Yes, spoke to. would like last week that we bring which way to go about it because I have the financial means to go about what I need to do. So didn't know if I need to go downtown start. The press is ordered to go to a company. So want to get those 2 the ways to get at will be fine because everything else is to date in compliance. >> All right. All right. Well, then I guess we're just put on my front pushes south you some time to do that. He would. you think it's going to take that? >> I was a fence already in his offense yet. Is this that these events right whoever did from the city can come out? I can pay them when they out and make sure it's on my property 9. That's not a problem. So does she need a contractor to call that enters? know, she could do it herself because she owns the property in her name. So she on call while she has to do it and application. >> And then it has to go through approval, you know, through zoning and OK, maybe a suggestion, just walk over next door in time get the application or maybe talked him. Yeah, maybe go over to the you could go over to permitting is on the second floor. Zoning is on the 3rd. If you need something from zoning. But yeah, they'll be the ones reviewing it. Which one would have voted for with her meeting? Probably just to see what the process Okay. And then if you feel like you need to talk to zoning about offense, then you know, you see what they're going to need. Okay. So what if it already have timeline will not be able to okay have the money to pay for it to make a great, great, great. Okay. So let's go. You want to go 30 days or 45 whatever so that they can get out. >> Let's go. I full on the 13th August, the 20th with WPP year will be fun, OK? You want mornings or afternoons afternoon. will be fine. OK? I have a 1 o'clock on August. The 20th. Okay. That's fine. Okay. >> All right. That's what I Continue the case at the August 22,026, 00:01PM, and 5 about 105, 0.1. Continuing with the other 2 violations. 16 47 was corrected back on July. 15th remains in compliance as well. 16 50 on June 10th Amendment 2023 Mazen Steven sounds like you're on top of. We'll we'll see you then. OK, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. >> We're gonna go on record for city of Sarasota Jane Warren Wallace. We have hearing a dog case. Number 20 for 2025, 0, 0, 9, 1, 7, 2025, 0, 0, 9, 1, 8, 2025, 0, 9, 1, 9, And so at this point, no one's here on behalf of the respondent. So the city's position on this case is that the larger keep showing up for this case money. Yes, okay. Okay. All right. Where are we today on this? OK? So I'm gonna highlight their all 3 for the same patients outlined those really Sure. >> All 3 have 34.5 dash one into the city code for operation advertisement of a vacation rental without a certificate. And then we have section 2, 3, of 4 be one of the zoning code which defines household living as periods a tenancy greater than one week and section 6 to be for permitted. Use anything less than that. One week, Tennessee is considered transient housing, which is not a permitted use in a single-family zone district correction We've got the I think we'll see. We've got July the 13th. I think all of them. So July 13th, the on all 3 cases. And so for the first case, the 2025, 0, 0, 9, 1, 7, We do have the fund. The certificates been issued. So we do have an affidavit to reflect what requesting here. This was for the first case and it shows potential civil fine of $36,500 inspections at $865. We're not going to be asking for all of that civil fine, but we are asking for $2000 fine then the city to recoup its costs of $765. And then on the other 2 cases were just asking you to find a violation. >> do all. Top the findings that outlined there and now just pose, a civil fine. The first case, 9, 1, 7, of $2000 assist Casa 7.65. think of a kitten that going and then on the other 2 pose no fine, no cost adopt the findings as well on the violations wrap up the cases. >> thank >> All right. We're on record for city of Sarasota versus JBC. See Development, LLC. It's number 2026, 0, 0, 6, 1, 4, And for the record, your name, please. >> Andrew Widman. You say Whitman W ID and me The idea made in that's you stand with >> All right. As women procedurally, I we start with the city of Sarasota misses Kennedy's in representing the city today, sir, show I'll end the city's position on this and I'll come back to get your response. Okay. So Kennedy, whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a new case today for a violation of our city Cause Section 16. 49 see for overgrowth with our last inspection, which was on July, the 14th, the property still has weeds some things so that it remains out of compliance at this time. So just be looking to miss women to see what the timeline is to bring the property into compliance. >> Okay. Miss women go to you. We have a. >> company that we've the consent once and and they were supposed to do. Hill. I see there's over growth on there, too. >> They were supposed to take care of all of that. It was a large sum of money to pay them to do that. >> Are they going move the large pile of juror or just cut the everything. Yeah. And so that's what it looks like now. >> July 14th. Yes, they were at their July 6th. They haven't anything over 12 inches needs to be cut down. So do you have a timeline kit for sending them back out? >> They say their next service is August 10th. I requested kind every 2 weeks instead the month that would better. Yes, with the rain, Aaron, the code I talked to him and he they really need to come. And yes, and all that know that mound