Congressional Hearing: The State of High-Speed Rail in the U.S.
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing serves as an official oversight review of federal transportation policy, which influences how government funds are allocated for national rail infrastructure projects.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Federal Railroad Administration
The agency is subject to congressional oversight regarding its management of the high-speed rail program.
Local Municipalities
Cities like Normal, Illinois, are involved in rail infrastructure projects that rely on federal policy and funding.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on July 14, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Transportation and Public Assets.
- The hearing's purpose was to conduct oversight of the federal high-speed rail program.
- Four witnesses provided testimony: Sarah Feinberg (FRA), Baruch Feigenbaum (Reason Foundation), Thomas Hart Jr. (Rail Forward), and Chris Koos (Mayor of Normal, IL).
- The subcommittee authorized the chair to declare a recess at any time.
- Congressman Rodney Davis was granted unanimous consent to participate in the proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing serves as an official oversight review of federal transportation policy, which influences how government funds are allocated for national rail infrastructure projects.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 2 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Oversight Focus
The hearing highlights a 2016 legislative effort to evaluate the effectiveness of federal high-speed rail investments.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools