POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House Committee Hearing on Reducing Industrial Emissions

Original title: SOLVING THE CLIMATE CRISIS: REDUCING INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS THROUGH U.S. INNOVATION

Record date · January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript from a 2019 House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis hearing. The committee met to discuss technological and policy strategies for reducing carbon emissions within the U.S. industrial sector, which includes manufacturing of steel, cement, and chemicals.

Why it matters

The hearing explores potential federal policy shifts that could impact the $3 trillion industrial sector and its 20 million jobs by setting new standards or incentives for carbon reduction in manufacturing.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Industrial manufacturers

These businesses are the primary focus of potential future regulations or incentives regarding carbon emissions.

Directly affected

Industrial sector employees

The 20 million jobs in this sector may be impacted by policy changes aimed at reducing industrial emissions.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 26, 2019, in the Capitol Visitor Center.
  • The industrial sector accounts for approximately 30 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
  • The industrial sector contributes over $3 trillion to the U.S. GDP.
  • The industrial sector supports nearly 20 million jobs in the United States.
Show all 8 facts
  • The committee discussed the role of raw material production, including steel, cement, fertilizer, plastics, and chemicals, in carbon output.
  • The hearing included testimony from four expert witnesses representing research and policy organizations.
  • Several documents were submitted for the record, including a report on federal policy, a letter from the United Steelworkers, and a letter from the American Forest & Paper Association.
  • The committee chair stated the goal of the hearing was to address a perceived policy void at the national level regarding climate action.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss how the U.S. can reduce carbon emissions in the industrial sector through innovation and new government policies.
Which industries were specifically mentioned as high-emission areas?
The committee focused on industries that produce raw materials, specifically steel, cement, fertilizer, plastics, and chemicals.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Industrial Sector

The committee explicitly noted a shift in focus from the power and transportation sectors to the industrial sector, which had previously received less policy attention.

Connected Entities

David Gardiner, Brad Crabtree, Garret Graves and 4 more
PersonDavid Gardiner“Witness, President of David Gardiner and Associates”Map →
PersonBrad Crabtree“Witness, Vice President of Carbon Management at Great Plains Institute”Map →
PersonGarret Graves“Ranking Member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis”Map →
OrganizationSelect Committee on the Climate Crisis“House committee conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonKathy Castor“Chair of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis”Map →
PersonJeremy Gregory“Witness, Executive Director of MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub”Map →
PersonCate Hight“Witness, Principal of Industry and Heavy Transport at Rocky Mountain Institute”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record