POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Digital Currency and Blockchain Technology

Original title: THE DISRUPTER SERIES: DIGITAL CURRENCY AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a 2016 House subcommittee hearing exploring the development and regulatory implications of digital currencies and technology. Industry experts and legal counsel provided testimony to help lawmakers understand the potential impacts of these emerging technologies.

Why it matters

The hearing established the early federal legislative framework for how digital assets and systems are understood and regulated in the United States.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Digital currency and blockchain companies

These entities provided testimony regarding the regulatory environment and technological potential of their industry.

Directly affected

House Committee on Energy and Commerce

The committee members gathered information to inform future legislative and oversight activities regarding financial technology.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 16, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The hearing was held by the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • The session was part of the 'Disrupter Series' focused on emerging technologies.
  • Seven industry experts and legal professionals provided testimony regarding digital currency and blockchain.
Show all 5 facts
  • A letter from Ryan Zagone of Ripple regarding regulatory relations was submitted into the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather information from industry experts about and technology as part of the committee's 'Disrupter Series'.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from Coin Center, Coinbase, IBM, Factom, Circle Internet Financial, BuckleySandler, and the Chamber of Digital Commerce.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Early Congressional Interest

The hearing demonstrates that Congress was actively investigating blockchain technology as early as 2016 under the 'Disrupter Series' framework.

Connected Entities

John Beccia, Dana V. Syracuse, Matthew Roszak and 5 more
PersonJohn Beccia“General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Circle Internet Financial”Map →
PersonDana V. Syracuse“Counsel, BuckleySandler, LLP”Map →
PersonMatthew Roszak“Chairman, Chamber of Digital Commerce, and Co-Founder, Bloq, Inc.”Map →
PersonPaul Snow“Chief Architect and Co-Founder, Factom, Inc.”Map →
PersonMichael C Burgess“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade”Map →
PersonJerry Brito“Executive Director, Coin Center”Map →
PersonJuan Suarez“Counsel, Coinbase, Inc.”Map →
PersonJerry Cuomo“Vice President, Blockchain Technologies, IBM”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record