POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

The RESULTS Act: Updating Medicare Lab Test Payment Rules

Original title: RESULTS Act

Last action · September 10, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Sponsors: Richard Hudson and 121 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

The RESULTS Act proposes changes to how Medicare calculates payment rates for s. It shifts data collection methods for certain tests to a third-party nonprofit database starting in 2028 to improve accuracy and reduce reporting burdens on laboratories.

Why it matters

This bill changes the data collection process used to set Medicare reimbursement rates for common lab tests, which affects how much Medicare pays laboratories and potentially impacts the availability of these tests for Medicare beneficiaries.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories

These entities will see changes to the data reporting requirements and the methodology used to determine their Medicare reimbursement rates.

Directly affected

Medicare Beneficiaries

These individuals may experience changes in the availability or access to diagnostic laboratory tests depending on how payment rate adjustments affect providers.

Directly affected

Department of Health and Human Services

The agency is tasked with contracting with an independent data entity and overseeing the new data collection process.

Key Facts

  • The bill is officially titled the 'Reforming and Enhancing Sustainable Updates to Laboratory Testing Services Act of 2025' or the 'RESULTS Act'.
  • Starting January 1, 2028, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must use data from a 'qualifying independent claims data entity' to set payment rates for widely available, non-advanced diagnostic laboratory tests.
  • The Secretary is required to contract with a national nonprofit organization to serve as the qualifying independent claims data entity.
  • The bill extends the data collection period for certain laboratory test reporting requirements from 2025 to 2027.
Show all 8 facts
  • The reporting period for specific laboratory tests is adjusted to begin January 1, 2028, and end March 31, 2028.
  • The definition of 'applicable laboratory' for reporting purposes is updated for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2028.
  • Qualifying independent claims data entities must be national nonprofits, unaffiliated with health insurance or provider organizations, and compliant with HIPAA privacy laws.
  • Qualifying databases must undergo quality assurance processes, including comprehensive statistical testing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will this change Medicare payments for lab tests?
Instead of relying solely on direct reporting from laboratories, the government will use data from an independent, nonprofit claims database to determine payment rates for common tests starting in 2028.
Who is considered a 'qualifying independent claims data entity'?
A national nonprofit organization that is not affiliated with health insurers, providers, or government agencies, and which maintains a database that meets specific privacy and quality assurance standards.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Sep 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. Sep 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

NATURAL RESOURCE RESULTS LLC

on behalf of BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

VENABLE LLP

on behalf of SUTTER HEALTH

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 117 more sponsors
Eleanor NortonHouse · District 0DemocraticCosponsorNo profile match
Pablo HernándezHouse · District 0DemocraticCosponsorNo profile match
Analilia MejiaHouse · District 11DemocraticCosponsorNo profile match
James WalkinshawHouse · District 11DemocraticCosponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Outsourcing Data Collection

The bill represents a shift from government-mandated direct reporting by labs to the use of third-party, nonprofit-managed claims databases for setting Medicare rates.

Connected Entities

Social Security Act, House Ways and Means Committee, House Energy and Commerce Committee and 1 more
otherSocial Security Act“The primary law being amended by this bill.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Ways and Means Committee“Congressional committee assigned to review the bill.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Energy and Commerce Committee“Congressional committee assigned to review the bill.”Map →
PersonMr. Hudson“Primary sponsor of the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record