POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

House Subcommittee Hearing on 2022 Nuclear Defense Budget

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 117-42] FISCAL YEAR 2022 BUDGET REQUEST FOR NUCLEAR FORCES AND ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the stage for how the U.S. allocates funding for its and atomic defense programs, which directly impacts long-term military readiness and federal spending priorities for the 2022 fiscal year.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for executing the budget and programs discussed in the hearing.

National Nuclear Security Administration

The agency manages the atomic energy defense activities and nuclear modernization programs under review.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Strategic Forces held a hearing to review the Department of Defense's 2022 budget request for nuclear forces and atomic energy defense activities. Officials from the Department of Defense, the Navy, the Air Force, and the National Nuclear Security Administration testified on the status of nuclear modernization programs.

Key Facts

  • The hearing focused on the Fiscal Year 2022 budget request for nuclear forces and atomic energy defense activities.
  • The subcommittee reviewed the status of the nuclear triad and ongoing nuclear modernization programs.
  • Ranking Member Turner expressed concern regarding the impact of a potential continuing resolution (CR) on nuclear modernization efforts.
  • Ranking Member Turner proposed changing the federal fiscal year to align with the calendar year to provide more time for defense planning.
  • Ranking Member Turner stated that the President's budget request does not keep pace with inflation relative to the modernization efforts of adversaries including China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.
  • The hearing was held on June 10, 2021, via Webex.

Why It Matters

This hearing sets the stage for how the U.S. allocates funding for its and atomic defense programs, which directly impacts long-term military readiness and federal spending priorities for the 2022 fiscal year.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review the administration's budget request for nuclear weapons programs and atomic energy defense for the 2022 fiscal year.
Why is the 'continuing resolution' mentioned?
A continuing resolution is a temporary funding measure that keeps government agencies operating at previous levels; the Ranking Member noted that such delays can negatively impact long-term nuclear modernization projects.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Fiscal Year Alignment Proposal

Ranking Member Turner proposed a structural change to federal budgeting by aligning the fiscal year with the calendar year to improve defense planning efficiency.

Connected Entities

personMelissa DaltonActing Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans, and CapabilitiesMap →
personJohnny R. Wolfe, Jr.Director, Strategic Systems Programs, U.S. NavyMap →
personJim CooperChairman of the Subcommittee on Strategic ForcesMap →
personCharles P. VerdonActing Administrator, National Nuclear Security AdministrationMap →
personJames C. Dawkins, Jr.Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration, U.S. AirMap →
personMichael R. TurnerRanking Member of the Subcommittee on Strategic ForcesMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record