POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to livestream and record public court proceedings

Original title: Courtroom Audiovisual Modifications

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsors: Mike Kohler and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Utah HB 397 requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to provide free public s and archived audiovisual recordings of open court proceedings starting May 6, 2026. The legislation exempts justice and juvenile courts, and allows judges to restrict or terminate broadcasts under specific circumstances such as privacy or fairness risks.

Why it matters

Members of the public gain remote access to observe district and appellate court proceedings online, while courts must implement safeguards to protect jurors, minors, confidential communications, and trial fairness.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Administrative Office of the Courts

Must implement technology and staff workflows to livestream, record, censor, and archive eligible court proceedings.

Directly affected

General public

Gains free remote access to watch live and recorded public court proceedings online.

Directly affected

Jurors and prospective jurors

Receive protection from audio or visual transmission during court proceedings.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which courts are required to provide livestreams under this bill?
The Administrative Office of the Courts must provide s for public court proceedings, but the requirement explicitly excludes justice courts and juvenile courts.
Can a judge stop a livestream while a court proceeding is happening?
Yes, a court may order the suspension or termination of a if circumstances arise that risk compromising a fair trial, witness safety, victim rights, or personal privacy.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Feb 17, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0397S01
  4. Feb 11, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0397S01
  5. Feb 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0397S01
  6. Feb 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0397S01
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Jan 30, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  2. Jan 30, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0397
  3. Jan 30, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0397
  4. Jan 28, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  5. Jan 28, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  6. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0397
  7. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0397
  8. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  9. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Administrative Office of the Courts, Utah
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the Courts“Required to livestream and record court proceedings”Map →
locationUtah“State where the legislation applies”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record