POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Human Rights in Iran

Original title: THE SHAME OF IRANIAN HUMAN RIGHTS

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional scrutiny regarding Iran's human rights practices, which lawmakers argue is essential context for evaluating the administration's nuclear diplomacy and foreign policy decisions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Iranian citizens

The hearing discusses the human rights conditions and legal treatment of individuals living under the Iranian regime.

U.S. Congress

The committees are responsible for oversight of foreign policy and evaluating the implications of nuclear negotiations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a joint congressional hearing held on February 26, 2015, to examine the human rights record of the Iranian government. The hearing was convened by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs to provide context for ongoing nuclear negotiations and international relations with Iran.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 26, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • A U.N. Special Rapporteur report cited at least 852 executions in Iran between July 2013 and June 2014.
  • Iranian human rights activists reported 1,181 executions during the same period.
  • The U.N. report noted that some individuals executed in Iran were under the age of 18.
  • The U.S. Department of State reported human rights violations in Iran including disappearances, torture, and judicially sanctioned amputation and flogging.
  • The hearing was held to scrutinize Iran's human rights record in the context of ongoing nuclear negotiations.
  • Witnesses provided prepared statements and proposals for the record.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional scrutiny regarding Iran's human rights practices, which lawmakers argue is essential context for evaluating the administration's nuclear diplomacy and foreign policy decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine the human rights record of the Iranian government and to provide context for U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Shayan Arya (Constitutionalist Party of Iran), Mohsen Sazegara (Research Institute on Contemporary Iran), and Anthony Vance (U.S. Baha'i Office of Public Affairs).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Contextualizing Nuclear Diplomacy

The hearing demonstrates a legislative effort to link human rights performance directly to the credibility of nuclear non-proliferation negotiations.

Connected Entities

personChristopher H. SmithChairman of the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and Map →
personMohsen SazegaraWitness, President of the Research Institute on Contemporary IranMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Foreign AffairsCongressional committee overseeing the hearingMap →
personAnthony VanceWitness, Director of the U.S. Baha'i Office of Public AffairsMap →
personShayan AryaWitness, Central Committee Member of the Constitutionalist Party of IranMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record