The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing: U.S. Foreign Policy in Asia
Record date · January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The House Committee on Foreign Affairs held a hearing on April 28, 2016, to discuss U.S. strategy, security challenges, and diplomatic relations in the Asia-Pacific region. The discussion focused on North Korean nuclear threats, territorial disputes in the South China Sea, and human rights concerns in Vietnam.
This hearing reviewed the implementation of U.S. against North Korea and the administration's diplomatic approach to territorial tensions in the South China Sea, which directly impacts U.S. national security and international trade routes.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
North Korea
The regime is the subject of U.S. sanctions legislation and international scrutiny discussed during the hearing.
U.S. Department of State
The agency is responsible for implementing the foreign policy and sanctions strategies discussed by the committee.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on April 28, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The committee reviewed the status of North Korea's nuclear program following its fourth nuclear test in January 2016.
- Chairman Royce noted that the President signed bipartisan sanctions legislation targeting North Korea's financial resources.
- The committee discussed reports of prohibited arms deals involving North Korea that continue to provide cash to the regime.
Show all 8 facts
- The hearing addressed China's land reclamation and militarization activities in the South China Sea.
- The committee raised concerns regarding human rights practices in Vietnam, specifically the treatment of bloggers, journalists, and political dissidents.
- The committee requested that the administration increase the designation of companies, banks, and individuals for sanctions related to North Korean activities.
- The committee noted that no North Korean officials had been sanctioned specifically for human rights abuses as of the date of the hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
What specific actions did the committee urge the administration to take regarding North Korea?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift toward aggressive sanctions
The hearing highlights a legislative push to force the executive branch to use specific sanctions tools against North Korea that were previously underutilized.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools