POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

California SB 994 bans local officials from using nondisclosure agreements to block information sharing

Original title: Local agencies: nondisclosure agreements.

Record date · August 21, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

SB 994 prohibits local agency officials and employees from entering into nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) that prevent them from sharing public business information with their fellow board members or governing bodies. Any such agreements signed after January 1, 2027, will be legally .

Why it matters

This bill ensures that local government officials remain accountable to their colleagues and governing bodies by preventing the use of private contracts to withhold information about public business.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Local agency officials

They are prohibited from entering into specific types of NDAs and must disclose existing ones.

Directly affected

Local agency employees

They are prohibited from entering into NDAs that restrict sharing information with their governing body.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill ban all nondisclosure agreements for local officials?
No. It specifically prohibits NDAs that prevent officials or employees from sharing information about public business with their fellow board members or governing bodies.
What happens if an official signed a restrictive NDA before 2027?
The bill requires the official to disclose the existence of that agreement, though the agreement itself does not become void until the January 1, 2027, deadline.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history & redline

5 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 5 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing SB994 → 02/05/26 - Introduced
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

timeout exceeded when trying to connect

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of Legislative Ethics

The bill extends existing state-level legislative ethics prohibitions regarding NDAs to the local government level.

Connected Entities

Commission on State Mandates
OrganizationCommission on State Mandates“Responsible for determining if the bill creates state-mandated costs requiring r”Map →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record