The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island bill expands employer personnel record retention and increases violation penalties
Last action · February 5, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Evan Shanley and 6 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Employers in Rhode Island are required to create, maintain, and retain employee personnel records for at least three years after an employee's termination under a newly proposed labor bill, which also increases financial penalties for violations.
The measure establishes a fixed post-termination timeline for document retention and alters the financial liability employers face for failing to comply with personnel file rules.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Employers
Employers must comply with extended record retention mandates and face increased financial penalties for violations.
Employees
Employees have guaranteed access to preserved personnel records for an extended period following termination.
Key Facts
- Employers are required to create, maintain, and retain employee personnel records.
- Personnel records must be retained for at least 3 years following an employee's termination.
- Financial penalties for each violation of personnel file rules are increased.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long must employers keep personnel records after an employee leaves?
What happens to penalties for violations under this measure?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Feb 5, 2026Committee recommended measure be held for further study
- Jan 30, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (02/05/2026)
- Jan 30, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to House Labor
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
