POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Establishes Procedures to Remove Unlawful Discriminatory Restrictions from Land Records and Deeds

Original title: Uniform Unlawful Restriction in Land Records Act

Last action · January 23, 2026: To JudiciarySponsors: Mike Oliverio and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 146 creates the Uniform in Land Records Act, allowing individual property owners and homeowners association governing bodies to record s removing discriminatory restrictions based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, or other protected characteristics without requiring a member vote. The measure requires county recorders to log and cross-reference these amendments and protects counties from liability for recording them.

Why it matters

Property owners and associations gain a standardized legal mechanism to expunge discriminatory covenants from property titles, and county clerks are shielded from legal liability when recording these s.

Background
  • State legislatures frequently consider uniform acts drafted by the Uniform Law Commission to harmonize state laws across the country. context
  • Discriminatory covenants based on race or religion were historically common in older property deeds before being rendered legally unenforceable by federal court rulings and the Fair Housing Act. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Real property owners

Property owners are granted the authority to submit amendments to county recorders to remove unlawful restrictions from their property titles.

Directly affected

Associations of owners

Association governing bodies are authorized to amend governing instruments to remove unlawful restrictions without requiring a member vote.

Directly affected

County commission clerks

Clerks are required to record, index, and cross-reference submitted amendments and are protected from liability for doing so.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can request the removal of an unlawful restriction from a property deed?
An individual owner of real property or a member of an association of owners can request or execute an to remove an .
Do homeowners association members need to vote to approve the removal of a discriminatory restriction?
No, the governing body of an association may amend the to remove an without a vote of the members.
Are county clerks liable if they record an amendment under this act?
No, the county commission clerk and the county are explicitly not liable for recording an under this article.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Jan 23, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  2. Jan 23, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported do pass, but first to Judiciary
  3. Jan 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Government Organization
  4. Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  5. Jan 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Government Organization then Judiciary
  6. Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Adoption of Uniform Law Commission Act

The bill introduces standardized procedures from the Uniform Law Commission to handle discriminatory land covenants across county records.

Connected Entities

Mike Oliverio, Bill Hamilton, Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
PersonMike Oliverio“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 146”Map →
PersonBill Hamilton“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 146”Map →
otherElectronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act“Federal act modified or superseded in part by the article”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record