The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on U.S. Security Role in the South China Sea
Record date · January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding U.S. security interests and military strategy in the South China Sea. Experts and committee members discussed the geopolitical implications of territorial disputes and the appropriate level of U.S. military focus in the region.
The hearing examines the strategic priorities of the U.S. military and potential shifts in and research focus regarding regional tensions in the South China Sea.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Department of Defense
The department's research and procurement priorities are subject to congressional oversight and debate regarding their focus on the South China Sea.
China
The hearing discusses China's territorial activities and trade relations in the South China Sea.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on July 23, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The subcommittee examined the U.S. security role in the South China Sea.
- Four witnesses provided expert testimony and prepared statements regarding regional security.
- Representative Brad Sherman argued that the Pentagon should prioritize fighting Islamic extremist terrorism over reconfiguring itself to focus on potential conflict with China.
Show all 6 facts
- Representative Sherman questioned the strategic significance of trade statistics cited regarding the South China Sea, noting that much of the trade is destined for or originating from Chinese ports.
- The hearing was held to discuss the geopolitical and military implications of land reclamation on islets in the South China Sea.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Military Focus Debate
The transcript highlights a specific congressional concern regarding the Pentagon's potential shift in procurement focus from counter-terrorism to regional maritime competition.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools