POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota Legislature proposes interim study on county mental illness boards and involuntary commitment

Original title: encouraging the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council to form an interim legislative committee to study the role and function of county boards of mental illness.

Last action · March 3, 2026: Deferred to the 41st legislative daySponsors: Erik Muckey and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

encouraging the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council to form an interim legislative committee to study the role and function of county boards of mental illness.

Why it matters

The measure carries no force of law and appropriates no funds, serving solely as a recommendation to legislative leadership to establish a study committee that could recommend future statutory changes for mental health systems and background check reporting.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

county boards of mental illness

Their authority, training standards, and operational frameworks are the subject of the proposed legislative study.

Directly affected

behavioral health providers

Their perspectives and experiences with the commitment process are requested for inclusion in the study.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this resolution change state laws immediately?
No. As a concurrent resolution, it simply encourages the Legislative Research Council Executive Board to form a study committee and does not enact binding laws or appropriate funds.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

12 actions
  1. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Deferred to the 41st legislative day
  2. Mar 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass
  3. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
  4. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to
  5. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First Reading Senate
  6. Feb 18, 2026HouseCommittee
    Adopt Resolution as amended
Show 6 earlier actions
  1. Feb 11, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  2. Feb 11, 2026House
    Amend the amendment
  3. Feb 11, 2026House
    Motion to amend
  4. Feb 11, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  5. Feb 6, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to
  6. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First Reading House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse2/18/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Adopt Resolution as amended

Total

70

Yes
46
No
21
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
3

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council, National Instant Criminal Background Check System, Office of the Attorney General and 1 more
OrganizationExecutive Board of the Legislative Research Council“Requested to form an interim legislative committee”Map →
OrganizationNational Instant Criminal Background Check System“Recipient of involuntary commitment information transmittals”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Involved in the proposed study perspectives”Map →
OrganizationUnified Judicial System“Involved in the proposed study perspectives”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record