POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on State and Local Responses to Domestic Terrorism

Original title: STATE AND LOCAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC TERRORISM: THE ATTACK ON THE U.S. CAPITOL AND BEYOND

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing establishes the federal legislative focus on coordinating domestic counterterrorism efforts between state, local, and federal agencies following the January 6th Capitol attack.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State and Local Law Enforcement

These agencies are responsible for implementing counterterrorism strategies and managing local responses to violent extremism.

Department of Homeland Security

The federal agency tasked with coordinating national security and counterterrorism policy.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a March 24, 2021, House Subcommittee hearing regarding how state and local governments are addressing the rise of and violent extremism. The hearing featured testimony from state attorneys general and a district attorney to discuss the challenges of managing these threats at the local level.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 24, 2021, by the Subcommittee on Intelligence and Counterterrorism.
  • The primary focus was examining state and local responses to domestic terrorism and violent extremism.
  • Witnesses included the Attorneys General of Michigan and Nevada, and the District Attorney of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin.
  • The hearing addressed the normalization of political violence and mass violence in society.
  • The subcommittee received written statements and letters for the record from various state-level legal officials, including the Attorney General of Oregon and the District Attorney of New York County.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to discuss how state and local governments are responding to the threat of and violent extremism.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses were Dana Nessel (Attorney General of Michigan), Aaron D. Ford (Attorney General of Nevada), and John T. Chisholm (District Attorney of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin).

Why It Matters

This hearing establishes the federal legislative focus on coordinating domestic counterterrorism efforts between state, local, and federal agencies following the January 6th Capitol attack.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Local-Federal Coordination

The hearing highlights a strategic shift toward integrating state and local legal officials into the federal counterterrorism framework.

Connected Entities

personElissa SlotkinChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Intelligence and CounterterrorismMap →
organizationCommittee on Homeland SecurityHouse committee overseeing the subcommitteeMap →
personDana NesselAttorney General of Michigan and hearing witnessMap →
personAaron D. FordAttorney General of Nevada and hearing witnessMap →
personJohn T. ChisholmDistrict Attorney of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin and hearing witnessMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record