POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofForeign Military Sales →
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Foreign Military Sales Program Oversight

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 114-123]ASSESSING THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE'S EXECUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE U.S. FOREIGN MILITARY SALES PROGRAM

January 1, 2017

Foreign Military SalesNational SecurityDefense ProcurementCongressional OversightNational Security CouncilMilitary Technology

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing addresses the speed and transparency of the process by which the U.S. sells military equipment to foreign allies, which impacts both national security partnerships and the domestic defense industrial base.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Foreign partner nations

These nations rely on the FMS program to acquire U.S. military equipment and technology.

U.S. defense industrial base

The defense industry relies on FMS contracts to support production and equipment development.

National Security Council

The NSC is the subject of proposed oversight and accountability measures discussed during the hearing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing to examine the efficiency and bureaucratic challenges of the U.S. program. Lawmakers discussed concerns regarding delays in military equipment sales to foreign partners and the role of the National Security Council in these processes.

Why It Matters

This hearing addresses the speed and transparency of the process by which the U.S. sells military equipment to foreign allies, which impacts both national security partnerships and the domestic defense industrial base.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was the third in a series conducted by the subcommittee to assess the Department of Defense's role in the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program.
  • The FMS program is a tool for building military capacity in foreign partner nations and supporting the U.S. defense industrial base.
  • Chairwoman Hartzler identified concerns regarding lengthy policy reviews and bureaucratic delays, specifically citing fighter aircraft sales delayed for over two years.
  • The subcommittee discussed the role of the National Security Council (NSC) in making operational decisions regarding military sales.
  • The hearing referenced amendments to the fiscal year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) aimed at increasing congressional oversight of the NSC.
  • Delays in the FMS process are partially attributed to the need to protect sensitive technology embedded in U.S. military products.
  • The subcommittee received testimony from officials representing the Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Defense Technology Security Administration, and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program?
It is a U.S. government program that facilitates the sale of defense equipment, services, and training to foreign governments and international organizations.
Why are there concerns about delays in military sales?
Lawmakers expressed concern that opaque bureaucratic reviews, particularly within the National Security Council, are slowing down the delivery of military capabilities to allies.
What is the role of the National Security Council in these sales?
The hearing noted that the NSC has been involved in policy deliberations for specific FMS cases, which some committee members argue has led to unnecessary delays.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Scrutiny of NSC

The hearing highlights a specific legislative effort in 2016 to shift power away from the National Security Council by increasing congressional oversight of its decision-making processes.

National Security CouncilMac Thornberry

Connected Entities

personVicky Hartzler“Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations”Map →
personBeth McCormick“Director, Defense Technology Security Administration”Map →
organizationNational Security Council“Cited as a source of bureaucratic delays in FMS cases”Map →
personJoseph Rixey“Director, Defense Security Cooperation Agency”Map →
personMac Thornberry“Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee”Map →
personClaire Grady“Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy”Map →
personJackie Speier“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record